Eva Mösker
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
- Fungal Biology and Applications
- Microbiology top 10%
- Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
Papers in
-
- Biochemical and Structural Characterization 7
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 2
- Pharmacology 11
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 11
- Fungal Biology and Applications 2
- Co-authors
- Roderich D. Süßmuth (17 shared papers)Sónia Mendo (6 shared papers)Tânia Caetano (6 shared papers)Bartlomiej Krawczyk (2 shared papers)Agnes Mühlenweg (2 shared papers)R. Kappe (1 shared paper)Thomas Paululat (1 shared paper)Roland W.S. Weber (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition (3 papers)Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (2 papers)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Biotechnology and Bioengineering (1 paper)Colloids and Surfaces B Biointerfaces (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyPortugalUnited States
In The Last Decade
Eva Mösker
18 papers receiving 501 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Pharmacology 240
- Microbiology 47
- Biotechnology 51
- Food Science 93
- Molecular Biology 298
Countries citing papers authored by Eva Mösker
This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Mösker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Mösker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Mösker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Mösker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Mösker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Mösker. The network helps show where Eva Mösker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Mösker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 107 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 73 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 55 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 46 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 21 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 3 |
About Eva Mösker
Eva Mösker is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Food Science, Genetics and Plant Science, having authored 18 papers that have together received 511 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (11 papers), Biochemical and Structural Characterization (7 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (4 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (2 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (2 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers) and Fungal Biology and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (240 citations), Microbiology (47 citations), Biotechnology (51 citations), Food Science (93 citations) and Molecular Biology (298 citations). Eva Mösker has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Portugal and United States. Frequent co-authors include Roderich D. Süßmuth, Sónia Mendo, Tânia Caetano, Bartlomiej Krawczyk, Agnes Mühlenweg, R. Kappe, Thomas Paululat, Roland W.S. Weber, Heidrun Anke and Mu‐Hyun Baik. Their work appears in journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Scientific Reports, Biotechnology and Bioengineering and Colloids and Surfaces B Biointerfaces.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.