Eva Hoch

76 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Eva Hoch's Hit Papers

Cannabis use and cannabis use disorder 2021 · 257 citations
2570+1+3Years since publication50100150200250

Peers

Eva Hoch
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Pharmacology 867
  • Applied Psychology 145
  • Toxicology 75
  • Clinical Psychology 347
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 232
Replace Marc L. Copersino with:
Marc L. Copersino United States
Dvora Shmulewitz United States
Erica N. Peters United States
Evan S. Herrmann United States
Dustin C. Lee United States
Victoria R. Votaw United States
Peggy van der Pol Netherlands
Robert C. Sterling United States
Pamela Sabioni Canada
John J. Mariani United States
Eva Hoch relative to Marc L. Copersino United States Marc L. Copersino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Marc L. Copersino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Hoch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Hoch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Hoch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Hoch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Hoch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Hoch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Hoch. The network helps show where Eva Hoch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Hoch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Hoch Line = papers co-authored together Eva Hoch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Cannabis use and cannabis use disorder
Hit paper breakdown →
2021257
2 2019143
3 202095
4 201978
5 201572
6 201964
7 201654
8 201349
9 202144
10 200435
11 201134
12 201733
13 201129
14 202428
15 202126
16 201726
17 201725
18 202122
19 201522
20 201619

About Eva Hoch

Eva Hoch is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, General Health Professions and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 87 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (41 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (26 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (12 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (12 papers), Health and Medical Studies (11 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (10 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (8 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (867 citations), Applied Psychology (145 citations), Toxicology (75 citations), Clinical Psychology (347 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (232 citations). Eva Hoch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Wayne Hall, Ulrich W. Preuss, Bernard Le Foll, Daniel Stjepanović, Alan J. Budney, Jason P. Connor, Valentina Lorenzetti, Miriam Schneider, Chris M. Friemel and Anil Batra. Their work appears in journals such as European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, European Addiction Research, Addiction, Frontiers in Psychiatry and International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact