Eva Biringer

1.6k citations
63 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 19

Eva Biringer

57 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Eva Biringer
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Pharmacy 94
  • Clinical Psychology 329
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 202
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 165
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 209
Replace Kelsey T. Laird with:
Kelsey T. Laird United States
Joshua A. Rash Canada
María Elena Medina Mora Mexico
J. Kim Penberthy United States
Marijo Tamburrino United States
Paolo Leombruni Italy
Mei‐Chih Meg Tseng Taiwan
Elizabeth H. Evans United Kingdom
Patrícia Moreno-Peral Spain
Alejandra Pinto‐Meza Spain
Eva Biringer relative to Kelsey T. Laird United States Kelsey T. Laird's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Kelsey T. Laird · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Biringer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Biringer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Biringer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Biringer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Biringer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Biringer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Biringer. The network helps show where Eva Biringer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Biringer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Biringer Line = papers co-authored together Eva Biringer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20240
3 20244
4 20230
5 20223
6 20218
7 20212
8 20197
9 201828
10 201815
11 201720
12 201616
13 20163
14 201518
15 201512
16 201531
17 201418
18 201145
19 201020
20 2005115

About Eva Biringer

Eva Biringer is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Health Professions, Pharmacy, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (14 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (12 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (8 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (6 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (6 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers) and Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (94 citations), Clinical Psychology (329 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (202 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (165 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (209 citations). Eva Biringer has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Arnstein Mykletun, Anders Lund, Tone Tangen, Miriam Hartveit, Oddbjørn Hove, Kirsten I. Stordal, Marit Borg, Torleif Ruud, Mikael Heimann and Wenche Andersen Helland. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Health Services Research, European Psychiatry, Child Psychiatry & Human Development, BMC Psychiatry and Scandinavian Journal of Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026