Eun‐Ok Im

6.5k citations
219 papers · 4.4k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 32

Eun‐Ok Im

207 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Hit Papers

Experiencing Transitions: An Emerging Middle-Range Theory1.1k20002026200820172505007501000

Peers

Eun‐Ok Im
Comparison fields: 5 of 173
  • Research and Theory 120
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 108
  • General Health Professions 1.5k
  • Applied Psychology 220
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 224
Replace Wenru Wang with:
Wenru Wang Singapore
Shirley M. Moore United States
Soeren Mattke United States
Lisa Whitehead Australia
Peter Norton Canada
José Côté Canada
Ardith Z. Doorenbos United States
Anneke L. Francke Netherlands
Winnie K.W. So Hong Kong
Ruth A. Anderson United States
Eun‐Ok Im relative to Wenru Wang Singapore Wenru Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Wenru Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eun‐Ok Im

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eun‐Ok Im's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eun‐Ok Im with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eun‐Ok Im more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eun‐Ok Im

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eun‐Ok Im. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eun‐Ok Im. The network helps show where Eun‐Ok Im may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eun‐Ok Im, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eun‐Ok Im Line = papers co-authored together Eun‐Ok Im links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20251
3 20235
4 202212
5 202210
6 20221
7 20211
8 20211
9 20212
10 20204
11 20191
12
Translation and Validation of Korean Version of the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire
20181
13 201711
14 201511
15 20125
16 201043
17 201024
18 200915
19 200814
20 200776

About Eun‐Ok Im

Eun‐Ok Im is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Research and Theory, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Applied Psychology and Leadership and Management, having authored 219 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (46 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (43 papers), Health and Wellbeing Research (30 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (25 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (21 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (21 papers), Family Support in Illness (18 papers) and Phytoestrogen effects and research (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (120 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (108 citations), General Health Professions (1.5k citations), Applied Psychology (220 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (224 citations). Eun‐Ok Im has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Afaf Ibrahim Meleis, Wonshik Chee, Karen Schumacher, DeAnne K. Hilfinger Messias, Linda M. Sawyer, Eunice Chee, Yaelim Lee, Bokim Lee, Alexa Stuifbergen and Young Ko. Their work appears in journals such as Western Journal of Nursing Research, CIN Computers Informatics Nursing, Advances in Nursing Science, Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society and Cancer Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026