782 total citations 5 papers, 110 citations indexed
About
Eunice Pontes is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Philosophy and Literature and Literary Theory.
According to data from OpenAlex, Eunice Pontes has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 110 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Language and Linguistics, 3 papers in Philosophy and 2 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Eunice Pontes's work include Linguistics and Language Studies (4 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (2 papers) and Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies (2 papers). Eunice Pontes is often cited by papers focused on Linguistics and Language Studies (4 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (2 papers) and Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies (2 papers). Eunice Pontes collaborates with scholars based in . Eunice Pontes's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Cadernos de Linguística e Teoria da Literatura (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais).
This map shows the geographic impact of Eunice Pontes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eunice Pontes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eunice Pontes more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eunice Pontes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eunice Pontes. The network helps show where Eunice Pontes may publish in the future.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.