Debra Parker-Oliver

612 total citations
22 papers, 444 citations indexed

About

Debra Parker-Oliver is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Debra Parker-Oliver has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 444 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 9 papers in General Health Professions and 5 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Recurrent topics in Debra Parker-Oliver's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (12 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (8 papers) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (5 papers). Debra Parker-Oliver is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (12 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (8 papers) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (5 papers). Debra Parker-Oliver collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Debra Parker-Oliver's co-authors include George Demiris, Marilyn Rantz, Davina Porock, Gregory F. Petroski, Brian Hensel, Laura R. Bronstein, Steven Zweig, Karla T. Washington, Barbara Head and Deborah P. Waldrop and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management and Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

In The Last Decade

Debra Parker-Oliver

22 papers receiving 423 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Debra Parker-Oliver United States 13 251 228 88 59 53 22 444
Josie Dixon United Kingdom 12 399 1.6× 318 1.4× 219 2.5× 22 0.4× 108 2.0× 37 653
Tor Inge Romøren Norway 14 96 0.4× 367 1.6× 42 0.5× 48 0.8× 25 0.5× 31 546
Suman Budhwani Canada 9 223 0.9× 171 0.8× 67 0.8× 32 0.5× 14 0.3× 15 403
Nienke Bekkema Netherlands 11 235 0.9× 180 0.8× 138 1.6× 13 0.2× 20 0.4× 22 492
Rebecca Hawkins United Kingdom 12 82 0.3× 206 0.9× 35 0.4× 58 1.0× 11 0.2× 25 378
Marit Solbjør Norway 15 101 0.4× 361 1.6× 71 0.8× 8 0.1× 23 0.4× 47 608
Tiffany Washington United States 11 63 0.3× 224 1.0× 56 0.6× 17 0.3× 22 0.4× 43 384
Julia Arndt Canada 3 223 0.9× 431 1.9× 44 0.5× 17 0.3× 28 0.5× 6 529
Trent L. Wei United States 9 89 0.4× 226 1.0× 56 0.6× 31 0.5× 47 0.9× 11 366
Jane B. Neese United States 10 83 0.3× 220 1.0× 66 0.8× 12 0.2× 15 0.3× 19 382

Countries citing papers authored by Debra Parker-Oliver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debra Parker-Oliver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra Parker-Oliver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra Parker-Oliver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debra Parker-Oliver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra Parker-Oliver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra Parker-Oliver. The network helps show where Debra Parker-Oliver may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Debra Parker-Oliver

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Debra Parker-Oliver. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Debra Parker-Oliver based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Debra Parker-Oliver. Debra Parker-Oliver is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cruz‐Oliver, Dulce M., Martha Abshire Saylor, Katie E. Nelson, et al.. (2022). Hospice Family Caregiver Perceptions of Benefits and Challenges of a Telenovela Educational Intervention. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 25(6). 945–951. 7 indexed citations
2.
Han, Claire J., Nai‐Ching Chi, George Demiris, et al.. (2018). Communicating Caregivers' Challenges With Cancer Pain Management: An Analysis of Home Hospice Visits. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 55(5). 1296–1303. 13 indexed citations
3.
Glajchen, Myra, Cathy Berkman, Shirley Otis‐Green, et al.. (2018). Defining Core Competencies for Generalist-Level Palliative Social Work. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 56(6). 886–892. 37 indexed citations
4.
Parker-Oliver, Debra. (2016). Bearing Witness to the Exit: Depriving Death of Its Strangeness. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 19(3). 337–340. 1 indexed citations
5.
Albright, David L., et al.. (2015). The Social Convoy for Family Caregivers Over the Course of Hospice. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 51(2). 213–219. 20 indexed citations
6.
Zweig, Steven, Lori Popejoy, Debra Parker-Oliver, & Susan E. Meadows. (2011). The Physician's Role in Patients' Nursing Home Care. JAMA. 306(13). 1468–1468. 8 indexed citations
7.
Porock, Davina, Debra Parker-Oliver, Gregory F. Petroski, & Marilyn Rantz. (2010). The MDS Mortality Risk Index: The evolution of a method for predicting 6-month mortality in nursing home residents. BMC Research Notes. 3(1). 200–200. 74 indexed citations
8.
Hensel, Brian, Debra Parker-Oliver, George Demiris, & Marilyn Rantz. (2009). A Comparison of Video-Based Resident-Family Communication in a Nursing Home and a Congregate Living Facility. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 10(5). 342–347. 7 indexed citations
9.
Hensel, Brian, Debra Parker-Oliver, & George Demiris. (2006). Videophone Communication Between Residents and Family: A Case Study. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 8(2). 123–127. 43 indexed citations
10.
Parker-Oliver, Debra & George Demiris. (2006). Social Work Informatics: A New Specialty. Social Work. 51(2). 127–134. 48 indexed citations
11.
Parker-Oliver, Debra, et al.. (2005). Examining Variables Related to Successful Collaboration on the Hospice Team. Health & Social Work. 30(4). 279–286. 41 indexed citations
12.
Parker-Oliver, Debra, et al.. (2005). Dementia Special Care Units. Journal of Housing for the Elderly. 19(1). 113–125. 4 indexed citations
13.
Parker-Oliver, Debra. (2005). Asthma Management: A Role for Social Work. Health & Social Work. 30(2). 167–170. 1 indexed citations
14.
Parker-Oliver, Debra, Davina Porock, Steven Zweig, Marilyn Rantz, & Gregory F. Petroski. (2003). Hospice and Nonhospice Nursing Home Residents. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 6(1). 69–75. 26 indexed citations
15.
Parker-Oliver, Debra, et al.. (2002). Nursing Home Experience with Hospice. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 3(2). 46–50. 22 indexed citations
16.
Parker-Oliver, Debra, et al.. (2002). Nursing Home Experience with Hospice. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 3(2). 46–50. 4 indexed citations
17.
Parker-Oliver, Debra & Lee A. Crandall. (2002). Medication Assistance Program: University of Missouri Health Care Department of Social Services. Health & Social Work. 27(4). 303–306. 2 indexed citations
18.
Parker-Oliver, Debra. (2002). Hospice Experience and Perceptions in Nursing Homes. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 5(5). 713–720. 17 indexed citations
19.
Parker-Oliver, Debra. (2002). Redefining hope for the terminally ill. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®. 19(2). 115–120. 23 indexed citations
20.
Parker-Oliver, Debra. (2000). The Social Construction of the “Dying Role” and the Hospice Drama. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying. 40(4). 493–512. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026