Eugene D. Gierson
- Cancer Research top 0.5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Oncology top 5%
- Surgery top 5%
- Dermatology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Melvin J. SilversteinParvis GamagamiJames WaismanWilliam J. ColburnBernard S. LewinskyGregory M. SenofskyAlain BarthDavid Poller
- Topics
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (18 papers)Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (12 papers)Cancer and Skin Lesions (7 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetCancerRadiology
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Eugene D. Gierson
26 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Cancer Research 1.8k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.6k
- Oncology 729
- Surgery 715
- Dermatology 307
Countries citing papers authored by Eugene D. Gierson
This map shows the geographic impact of Eugene D. Gierson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eugene D. Gierson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eugene D. Gierson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eugene D. Gierson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eugene D. Gierson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eugene D. Gierson. The network helps show where Eugene D. Gierson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eugene D. Gierson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eugene D. Gierson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eugene D. Gierson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eugene D. Gierson. Eugene D. Gierson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Results from a multidisciplinary breast center. Analysis of disease discovered. | 10 |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 179 | |
| 4 | Prognostic classification of breast ductal carcinoma-in-situbreakdown → | 503 |
| 5 | Predicting axillary node positivity in patients with invasive carcinoma of the breast by using a combination of T category and palpability. | 77 |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 319 | |
| 8 | 185 | |
| 9 | 87 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 110 | |
| 12 | 56 | |
| 13 | Axillary lymphadenectomy for intraductal carcinoma of the breast. | 67 |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 39 | |
| 17 | 174 | |
| 18 | 65 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Eugene D. Gierson
Eugene D. Gierson is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Dermatology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (18 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (12 papers) and Cancer and Skin Lesions (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (1.8k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.6k citations) and Dermatology (307 citations). Eugene D. Gierson has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Melvin J. Silverstein, Parvis Gamagami, James Waisman, William J. Colburn, Bernard S. Lewinsky, Gregory M. Senofsky, Alain Barth, David Poller, Robert J. Rosser and Neal Handel. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Cancer and Radiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.