Etienne Pérot

945 total citations
9 papers, 172 citations indexed

About

Etienne Pérot is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, Etienne Pérot has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 172 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 3 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 2 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in Etienne Pérot's work include Planetary Science and Exploration (3 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (3 papers) and Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems (2 papers). Etienne Pérot is often cited by papers focused on Planetary Science and Exploration (3 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (3 papers) and Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems (2 papers). Etienne Pérot collaborates with scholars based in France, United States and Switzerland. Etienne Pérot's co-authors include James Masciarelli, Brian O’Sullivan, Cian Ryan, Joseph Lemley, C. Posch, Amos Sironi, Vincent Lepetit, Th. Martin, Eric M. Queen and Marie-Christine Desjean and has published in prestigious journals such as Neural Networks, HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) and Neural Information Processing Systems.

In The Last Decade

Etienne Pérot

9 papers receiving 161 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Etienne Pérot France	7	87	48	33	30	25	9	172
Frank Klefenz Germany	8	94 1.1×	9 0.2×	107 3.2×	31 1.0×	37 1.5×	39	224
G. Baltus Netherlands	3	25 0.3×	32 0.7×	10 0.3×	73 2.4×	15 0.6×	4	209
Francesco Paci Italy	7	9 0.1×	64 1.3×	12 0.4×	81 2.7×	20 0.8×	9	199
H. G. Virani India	10	61 0.7×	16 0.3×	170 5.2×	70 2.3×	17 0.7×	35	313
Jesse Leaman United States	6	14 0.2×	559 11.6×	20 0.6×	46 1.5×	68 2.7×	10	756
Barthélémy Heyrman France	8	64 0.7×	5 0.1×	119 3.6×	129 4.3×	3 0.1×	19	259
Matthew Clapp United Kingdom	6	51 0.6×	8 0.2×	165 5.0×	32 1.1×	14 0.6×	24	197
S. Hatakeyama Japan	7	32 0.4×	14 0.3×	16 0.5×	7 0.2×	9 0.4×	28	119
Peter Coppin Canada	8	8 0.1×	3 0.1×	82 2.5×	32 1.1×	37 1.5×	42	209
Manvinder Sharma India	9	41 0.5×	4 0.1×	99 3.0×	42 1.4×	4 0.2×	31	214

Countries citing papers authored by Etienne Pérot

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Etienne Pérot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Etienne Pérot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Etienne Pérot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Etienne Pérot

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Etienne Pérot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Etienne Pérot. The network helps show where Etienne Pérot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Etienne Pérot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Etienne Pérot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Etienne Pérot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Etienne Pérot. Etienne Pérot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Talbot, Hugues, et al.. (2022). Coronary Artery Centerline Tracking with the Morphological Skeleton Loss. 2022 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). 2741–2745. 1 indexed citations

2.

Ryan, Cian, et al.. (2021). Real-time face & eye tracking and blink detection using event cameras. Neural Networks. 141. 87–97. 61 indexed citations

3.

Pérot, Etienne, et al.. (2021). Detecting Stable Keypoints from Events through Image Gradient Prediction. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 1387–1394. 15 indexed citations

4.

Pérot, Etienne, et al.. (2020). Learning to Detect Objects with a 1 Megapixel Event Camera. Neural Information Processing Systems. 33. 16639–16652. 7 indexed citations

5.

Pérot, Etienne, Pierre Tapie, Pascal Vola, et al.. (2016). Design and improvements of the Attitude Control System of the FIREBall balloon experiment. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9905. 99053I–99053I. 3 indexed citations

6.

Martin, Th., et al.. (2013). Active Debris Removal mission design in Low Earth Orbit. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 12 indexed citations

7.

Pérot, Etienne, et al.. (2002). Aerocapture Guidance Algorithm Comparison Campaign. AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit. 14 indexed citations

8.

Pérot, Etienne, et al.. (2002). Importance of an On-board Estimation of the Density Scale Height for Various Aerocapture Guidance Algorithms. AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit. 13 indexed citations

9.

Masciarelli, James, et al.. (2000). An analytic aerocapture guidance algorithm for the Mars Sample Return Orbiter. 46 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact