Étienne Munch

1.6k citations
34 papers · 1.3k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Étienne Munch

33 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Étienne Munch
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Polymers and Plastics 520
  • Ceramics and Composites 213
  • Biomaterials 319
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 80
  • Biomedical Engineering 461
Replace Benjamin Church with:
Benjamin Church United States
Harry Abernathy United States
Sharmila M. Mukhopadhyay United States
Ellen L. Heeley United Kingdom
Yu‐Feng Meng China
Shuanhu Qi China
L. R. Sheppard Australia
C. K. L. Davies United Kingdom
Sungwoo Sohn United States
Chang Li China
Étienne Munch relative to Benjamin Church United States Benjamin Church's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Benjamin Church · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Étienne Munch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Étienne Munch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Étienne Munch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Étienne Munch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Étienne Munch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Étienne Munch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Étienne Munch. The network helps show where Étienne Munch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Étienne Munch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Étienne Munch Line = papers co-authored together Étienne Munch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009260
2 2009238
3 2014145
4 201258
5 200855
6 201554
7 198548
8 201547
9 201343
10 200643
11 201534
12 202032
13 201531
14 201631
15 198831
16 201526
17 200622
18 198721
19 201521
20
Characteristictime of strain induced crystallization of crosslinked natural rubber
201218

About Étienne Munch

Étienne Munch is a scholar working on Polymers and Plastics, Materials Chemistry, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Biomedical Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Polymer crystallization and properties (16 papers), Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties (14 papers), Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (9 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (9 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Elasticity and Material Modeling (5 papers), Block Copolymer Self-Assembly (4 papers) and Glass properties and applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Polymers and Plastics (520 citations), Ceramics and Composites (213 citations), Biomaterials (319 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (80 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (461 citations). Étienne Munch has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Antoni P. Tomsia, Nicolas Candau, Laurent Chazeau, Jean‐Marc Chenal, Sylvain Deville, Eduardo Saiz, Eduardo Saiz, Catherine Gauthier, Robert O. Ritchie and Rabia Laghmach. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Polymer, Macromolecules, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics and Polymers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact