Esther Janse

2.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
66 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

Esther Janse is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Signal Processing. According to data from OpenAlex, Esther Janse has authored 66 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 45 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 22 papers in Signal Processing. Recurrent topics in Esther Janse's work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (35 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (32 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (21 papers). Esther Janse is often cited by papers focused on Phonetics and Phonology Research (35 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (32 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (21 papers). Esther Janse collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Esther Janse's co-authors include Antje S. Meyer, Zeshu Shao, Patti Adank, Falk Huettig, Odette Scharenborg, Alexandra Jesse, Hugo Quené, S.G. Nooteboom, Mirjam Ernestus and Rochelle S. Newman and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Esther Janse

62 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Hit Papers

What do verbal fluency tasks measure? Predictors of verba... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Esther Janse Netherlands 20 1.2k 774 497 268 234 66 1.9k
Pascale Tremblay Canada 27 2.0k 1.7× 670 0.9× 512 1.0× 285 1.1× 50 0.2× 75 2.7k
Henrí Cohen Canada 27 778 0.6× 282 0.4× 663 1.3× 183 0.7× 52 0.2× 76 1.9k
Richard R. Hurtig United States 22 1.2k 0.9× 259 0.3× 269 0.5× 120 0.4× 136 0.6× 61 1.7k
Malcolm R. McNeil United States 30 2.3k 1.9× 730 0.9× 1.5k 3.0× 291 1.1× 46 0.2× 107 3.0k
Juan Silva‐Pereyra Mexico 27 1.8k 1.4× 347 0.4× 694 1.4× 256 1.0× 39 0.2× 83 2.3k
Laura Monetta Canada 20 923 0.8× 450 0.6× 276 0.6× 258 1.0× 27 0.1× 76 1.5k
Leonard L. LaPointe United States 21 855 0.7× 284 0.4× 444 0.9× 162 0.6× 19 0.1× 78 1.4k
Javier López‐Calderón United States 9 1.8k 1.5× 545 0.7× 317 0.6× 196 0.7× 33 0.1× 15 2.1k
Antonino Vallesi Italy 36 2.9k 2.4× 761 1.0× 351 0.7× 326 1.2× 14 0.1× 138 3.7k
Jed A. Meltzer Canada 26 1.6k 1.3× 224 0.3× 345 0.7× 388 1.4× 43 0.2× 69 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Esther Janse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Esther Janse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Esther Janse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Esther Janse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Esther Janse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Esther Janse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Esther Janse. The network helps show where Esther Janse may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Esther Janse

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Esther Janse. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Esther Janse based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Esther Janse. Esther Janse is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Janse, Esther, et al.. (2023). Diadochokinesis Performance and Its Link to Cognitive Control: Alternating Versus Non-Alternating Diadochokinesis. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 67(10S). 4096–4106. 3 indexed citations
2.
Tamati, Terrin N., Esther Janse, & Deniz Başkent. (2023). The relation between speaking-style categorization and speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(3). 35201–35201. 1 indexed citations
3.
Cooke, Martin, et al.. (2023). Speaking in the presence of noise: Consistency of acoustic properties in clear-Lombard speech over time. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 153(4). 2165–2165. 2 indexed citations
4.
Janse, Esther, et al.. (2016). Perception of Emotion in Conversational Speech by Younger and Older Listeners. Frontiers in Psychology. 7. 781–781. 30 indexed citations
5.
Scharenborg, Odette, et al.. (2016). Do Hearing Aids Improve Affect Perception?. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 894. 47–55. 11 indexed citations
6.
Dingemanse, Gertjan, et al.. (2016). Type of Speech Material Affects Acceptable Noise Level Test Outcome. Frontiers in Psychology. 7. 186–186. 8 indexed citations
7.
Huettig, Falk & Esther Janse. (2015). Individual differences in working memory and processing speed predict anticipatory spoken language processing in the visual world. Language Cognition and Neuroscience. 31(1). 80–93. 158 indexed citations
8.
Janse, Esther & Alexandra Jesse. (2014). Working Memory Affects Older Adults’ Use of Context in Spoken-Word Recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 67(9). 1842–1862. 41 indexed citations
9.
Rietveld, Toni, et al.. (2014). Relationship between perceptual learning in speech and statistical learning in younger and older adults. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 8. 628–628. 31 indexed citations
10.
Shao, Zeshu, et al.. (2014). What do verbal fluency tasks measure? Predictors of verbal fluency performance in older adults. Frontiers in Psychology. 5. 772–772. 757 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Scharenborg, Odette & Esther Janse. (2013). Comparing lexically guided perceptual learning in younger and older listeners. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 75(3). 525–536. 30 indexed citations
12.
Janse, Esther & Mirjam Ernestus. (2011). The roles of bottom-up and top-down information in the recognition of reduced speech: Evidence from listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Journal of Phonetics. 39(3). 330–343. 33 indexed citations
13.
Janse, Esther, Elise de Bree, & Susanne Brouwer. (2010). Decreased Sensitivity to Phonemic Mismatch in Spoken Word Processing in Adult Developmental Dyslexia. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 39(6). 523–539. 4 indexed citations
14.
Adank, Patti & Esther Janse. (2010). Comprehension of a novel accent by young and older listeners.. Psychology and Aging. 25(3). 736–740. 85 indexed citations
15.
Janse, Esther. (2009). Neighbourhood density effects in auditory non‐word processing in aphasic listeners. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 23(3). 196–207. 2 indexed citations
16.
Janse, Esther. (2007). Spoken-word processing in aphasia: Effects of item overlap and item repetition. Brain and Language. 105(3). 185–198. 5 indexed citations
17.
Bree, Elise de, et al.. (2007). Stress assignment in aphasia: Word and non-word reading and non-word repetition. Brain and Language. 103(3). 264–275. 2 indexed citations
18.
Janse, Esther. (2005). Lexical competition effects in aphasia: Deactivation of lexical candidates in spoken word processing. Brain and Language. 97(1). 1–11. 26 indexed citations
19.
Janse, Esther & Hugo Quené. (2004). On measuring multiple lexical activation using the cross-modal semantic priming technique. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 2. 105–114. 3 indexed citations
20.
Janse, Esther, et al.. (2000). Fast speech timing in Dutch: The durational correlates of lexical stress and pitch accent. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 251–254. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026