Esther Da Costa
About
In The Last Decade
Esther Da Costa
5 papers receiving 63 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
- Molecular Biology 46
- Genetics 25
- Plant Science 23
- Biotechnology 12
- Food Science 10
Countries citing papers authored by Esther Da Costa
This map shows the geographic impact of Esther Da Costa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Esther Da Costa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Esther Da Costa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Esther Da Costa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Esther Da Costa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Esther Da Costa. The network helps show where Esther Da Costa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Esther Da Costa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Esther Da Costa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Esther Da Costa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Esther Da Costa. Esther Da Costa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 7 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.