Er-Yen Yen
About
In The Last Decade
Er-Yen Yen
4 papers receiving 82 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 20
- Molecular Biology 69
- Cancer Research 55
- Immunology 18
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 9
- Oncology 8
Countries citing papers authored by Er-Yen Yen
This map shows the geographic impact of Er-Yen Yen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Er-Yen Yen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Er-Yen Yen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Er-Yen Yen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Er-Yen Yen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Er-Yen Yen. The network helps show where Er-Yen Yen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Er-Yen Yen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Er-Yen Yen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Er-Yen Yen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Er-Yen Yen. Er-Yen Yen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | Exosomal TGF-β1 is correlated with lymphatic metastasis of gastric cancers. | 67 |
| 4 | 10 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.