Erwin Keeve

1.6k total citations
45 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Erwin Keeve is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Computational Mechanics. According to data from OpenAlex, Erwin Keeve has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 16 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and 13 papers in Computational Mechanics. Recurrent topics in Erwin Keeve's work include 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (13 papers), Dental Radiography and Imaging (12 papers) and Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (9 papers). Erwin Keeve is often cited by papers focused on 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (13 papers), Dental Radiography and Imaging (12 papers) and Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (9 papers). Erwin Keeve collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Erwin Keeve's co-authors include Sabine Girod, Bernd Girod, Lutz Ritter, Joachim E. Zöller, Robert A. Mischkowski, Jörg Neugebauer, Ron Kikinis, Nicolai Adolphs, Bodo Hoffmeister and Weichen Liu and has published in prestigious journals such as Signal Processing, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Erwin Keeve

43 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Erwin Keeve Germany 18 478 292 267 207 207 45 1.1k
Xiangyang Ju United Kingdom 22 298 0.6× 231 0.8× 325 1.2× 196 0.9× 467 2.3× 73 1.3k
Wouter Mollemans Belgium 13 614 1.3× 263 0.9× 258 1.0× 143 0.7× 606 2.9× 30 1.2k
Ingela Nyström Sweden 15 276 0.6× 76 0.3× 77 0.3× 366 1.8× 297 1.4× 62 951
Michael Figl Austria 32 466 1.0× 922 3.2× 697 2.6× 729 3.5× 159 0.8× 117 2.3k
Felix Wanschitz Austria 25 821 1.7× 570 2.0× 781 2.9× 399 1.9× 239 1.2× 41 1.9k
Friedrich R. Carls Switzerland 11 69 0.1× 65 0.2× 197 0.7× 172 0.8× 49 0.2× 18 687
Filip Schutyser Belgium 24 2.6k 5.5× 754 2.6× 635 2.4× 162 0.8× 1.6k 7.8× 54 3.5k
Rüdiger Marmulla Germany 19 573 1.2× 413 1.4× 561 2.1× 207 1.0× 195 0.9× 53 1.2k
Tomaž Vrtovec Slovenia 24 541 1.1× 1.0k 3.5× 1.0k 3.9× 248 1.2× 131 0.6× 78 2.0k
Lutz P. Nolte Switzerland 32 284 0.6× 899 3.1× 2.5k 9.3× 141 0.7× 102 0.5× 79 3.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Erwin Keeve

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erwin Keeve's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erwin Keeve with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erwin Keeve more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erwin Keeve

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erwin Keeve. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erwin Keeve. The network helps show where Erwin Keeve may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erwin Keeve

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erwin Keeve. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erwin Keeve based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erwin Keeve. Erwin Keeve is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Adolphs, Nicolai, Weichen Liu, Erwin Keeve, & Bodo Hoffmeister. (2013). Craniomaxillofacial surgery planning based on 3D models derived from Cone-Beam CT data. Computer Aided Surgery. 18(5-6). 101–108. 15 indexed citations
2.
Keeve, Erwin, et al.. (2011). ORBIT - open X-ray scanner for image-guided interventional surgery - development of concept.. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 440. 1 indexed citations
3.
Khan, Martin, et al.. (2010). Overlay visualization in endoscopic ENT surgery. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. 6(3). 401–406. 38 indexed citations
4.
Neugebauer, Jörg, Lutz Ritter, Timo Dreiseidler, et al.. (2009). Computer-aided manufacturing technologies for guided implant placement. Expert Review of Medical Devices. 7(1). 113–129. 41 indexed citations
5.
Ritter, Lutz, Robert A. Mischkowski, Jörg Neugebauer, et al.. (2009). The influence of body mass index, age, implants, and dental restorations on image quality of cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 108(3). e108–e116. 33 indexed citations
6.
Neugebauer, Jörg, Robert A. Mischkowski, Lutz Ritter, et al.. (2008). Comparison of cone-beam volumetric imaging and combined plain radiographs for localization of the mandibular canal before removal of impacted lower third molars. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 105(5). 633–642. 54 indexed citations
7.
Mischkowski, Robert A., et al.. (2008). Diagnostic quality of multiplanar reformations obtained with a newly developed cone beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 37(1). 1–9. 33 indexed citations
8.
Liévin, Marc, et al.. (2005). Nerves - level sets for interactive 3D segmentation of nerve channels. 2. 201–204. 14 indexed citations
9.
Keeve, Erwin, et al.. (2004). Fourier Volume Rendering on the GPU Using a Split-Stream-FFT. Vision Modeling and Visualization. 395–403. 33 indexed citations
10.
Langlotz, Frank & Erwin Keeve. (2003). Minimally invasive approaches in orthopaedic surgery. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies. 12(1-2). 19–24. 5 indexed citations
11.
Keeve, Erwin & R. Kikinis. (2003). Deformable modeling of facial tissue. 1. 502–502.
12.
Liévin, Marc, et al.. (2002). INTERACTIVE 3D SEGMENTATION AND INSPECTION OF VOLUMETRIC MEDICAL DATASETS. Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering. 47(s1a). 75–78. 2 indexed citations
13.
Król, Zbigniew, et al.. (2002). SURGERY PLANNING TOOLS FOR THE OSSEOUS GRAFTING TREATMENT. Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering. 47(s1a). 97–100. 5 indexed citations
14.
Keeve, Erwin, et al.. (2002). JULIUS - A SOFTWARE FRAMEWORK FOR COMPUTER-AIDED-SURGERY. Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering. 47(s1a). 101–103. 7 indexed citations
15.
Sader, Robert, et al.. (2001). Computer assisted osteotomy design for autografts in craniofacial reconstructive surgery. International Congress Series. 1230. 44–50. 1 indexed citations
16.
Keeve, Erwin, Sabine Girod, Ron Kikinis, & Bernd Girod. (1998). Deformable Modeling of Facial Tissue for Craniofacial Surgery Simulation. Computer Aided Surgery. 3(5). 228–238. 73 indexed citations
17.
Keeve, Erwin, et al.. (1998). Deformable modeling of facial tissue for craniofacial surgery simulation. Computer Aided Surgery. 3(5). 228–238. 98 indexed citations
18.
Chabrerie, Alexandra, Fatma Özlen, Shin Nakajima, et al.. (1997). Three-Dimensional Reconstruction and Surgical Navigation in Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery. Pediatric Neurosurgery. 27(6). 304–310. 19 indexed citations
19.
Keeve, Erwin, et al.. (1996). Anatomy-based facial tissue modeling using the finite element method. IEEE Visualization. 21–28. 61 indexed citations
20.
Girod, Sabine, Erwin Keeve, & Bernd Girod. (1995). Advances in interactive craniofacial surgery planning by 3D simulation and visualization. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 24(1). 120–125. 84 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026