Erwin Idoux

14 papers receiving 376 citations

Peers

Erwin Idoux
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Sensory Systems 188
  • Neurology 291
  • Ophthalmology 54
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 106
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 99
Replace Pablo M. Blázquez with:
Pablo M. Blázquez United States
Paolo Valli Italy
G. A. Bush United States
Paola Perin Italy
Pablo M. Blázquez United States
Kristina B. Irwin United States
M. Mühlethaler Switzerland
Katsumi Ikarashi Japan
L. M. �dkvist Sweden
U. B�ttner Germany
Erwin Idoux relative to Pablo M. Blázquez United States Pablo M. Blázquez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Pablo M. Blázquez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Erwin Idoux

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erwin Idoux's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erwin Idoux with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erwin Idoux more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erwin Idoux

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erwin Idoux. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erwin Idoux. The network helps show where Erwin Idoux may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Erwin Idoux, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Erwin Idoux Line = papers co-authored together Erwin Idoux links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 200396
2 201261
3 200455
4 201734
5 200628
6 200325
7 201819
8 201118
9 200715
10 200812
11 20118
12
The linear and non-linear relationships between action potential discharge rates and membrane potential in model vestibular neurons
20046
13 20085
14 20132

About Erwin Idoux

Erwin Idoux is a scholar working on Neurology, Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 14 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vestibular and auditory disorders (11 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (10 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Connexins and lens biology (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (2 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (188 citations), Neurology (291 citations), Ophthalmology (54 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (106 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (99 citations). Erwin Idoux has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Mathieu Beraneck, Lee E. Moore, Pierre‐Paul Vidal, Nicolas Vibert, Atsuhiko Uno, Daniel Eugène, Emile Godaux, Laurence Ris, Michele Tagliabue and Lionel Revéret. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, Frontiers in Neurology, The Journal of Physiology, PLoS ONE and Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact