Erwin de Vries

668 total citations
17 papers, 415 citations indexed

About

Erwin de Vries is a scholar working on Surgery, Transplantation and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Erwin de Vries has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 415 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Surgery, 10 papers in Transplantation and 5 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Erwin de Vries's work include Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (12 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (10 papers) and Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (8 papers). Erwin de Vries is often cited by papers focused on Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (12 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (10 papers) and Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (8 papers). Erwin de Vries collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Germany. Erwin de Vries's co-authors include Jacqueline M. Smits, Axel Rahmel, Günther Laufer, Bruno Meiser, Michel De Pauw, Andreas Zuckermann, Guido G. Persijn, M. Strueber, Hermann Reichenspurner and Axel Haverich and has published in prestigious journals such as Transplantation, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation and The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation.

In The Last Decade

Erwin de Vries

17 papers receiving 410 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Erwin de Vries Netherlands 13 357 173 139 60 44 17 415
Jacob Simmonds United Kingdom 12 228 0.6× 51 0.3× 100 0.7× 16 0.3× 16 0.4× 38 323
Dominick Megna United States 12 310 0.9× 79 0.5× 144 1.0× 23 0.4× 17 0.4× 60 381
Matthew P. Weber United States 14 291 0.8× 57 0.3× 168 1.2× 33 0.6× 17 0.4× 50 490
Adrian Van Bakel United States 7 345 1.0× 240 1.4× 101 0.7× 11 0.2× 13 0.3× 10 446
O. Grauhan Germany 12 317 0.9× 87 0.5× 106 0.8× 24 0.4× 12 0.3× 48 406
Aliessa Barnes United States 10 315 0.9× 63 0.4× 230 1.7× 14 0.2× 7 0.2× 22 394
E Hodge United States 11 183 0.5× 206 1.2× 12 0.1× 62 1.0× 18 0.4× 32 325
José María Arizón del Prado Spain 11 344 1.0× 176 1.0× 141 1.0× 18 0.3× 3 0.1× 40 454
Jennie H. Kwon United States 10 242 0.7× 64 0.4× 114 0.8× 16 0.3× 13 0.3× 41 284
Masina Scavuzzo United States 9 324 0.9× 109 0.6× 78 0.6× 16 0.3× 13 0.3× 12 367

Countries citing papers authored by Erwin de Vries

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erwin de Vries's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erwin de Vries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erwin de Vries more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erwin de Vries

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erwin de Vries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erwin de Vries. The network helps show where Erwin de Vries may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erwin de Vries

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erwin de Vries. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erwin de Vries based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erwin de Vries. Erwin de Vries is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Hellemans, Rachel, Anneke Kramer, Johan De Meester, et al.. (2021). Does kidney transplantation with a standard or expanded criteria donor improve patient survival? Results from a Belgian cohort. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 36(5). 918–926. 15 indexed citations
2.
Boer, Jacob D. de, Marieke van Rosmalen, Erwin de Vries, et al.. (2018). The Effect of Histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate Solution and University of Wisconsin Solution: An Analysis of the Eurotransplant Registry. Transplantation. 102(11). 1870–1877. 13 indexed citations
3.
Boer, Jacob D. de, Andries E. Braat, Hein Putter, et al.. (2018). Outcome of Liver Transplant Patients With High Urgent Priority: Are We Doing the Right Thing?. Transplantation. 103(6). 1181–1190. 10 indexed citations
4.
Vries, Erwin de, Jan de Boer, Hein Putter, et al.. (2016). Donor risk indices in pancreas allocation in the Eurotransplant region. Transplant International. 29(8). 921–929. 12 indexed citations
5.
Györi, Georg, Gerd R. Silberhumer, Axel Rahmel, et al.. (2016). Impact of dynamic changes in MELD score on survival after liver transplantation – a Eurotransplant registry analysis. Liver International. 36(7). 1011–1017. 15 indexed citations
6.
Smits, Jacqueline M., Josef Thul, Michel De Pauw, et al.. (2014). Pediatric heart allocation and transplantation in Eurotransplant. Transplant International. 27(9). 917–925. 22 indexed citations
7.
Smits, Jacqueline M., Erwin de Vries, Michel De Pauw, et al.. (2013). Is it time for a cardiac allocation score? First results from the Eurotransplant pilot study on a survival benefit–based heart allocation. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 32(9). 873–880. 52 indexed citations
8.
Smits, Jacqueline M., Michel De Pauw, Erwin de Vries, et al.. (2011). Donor scoring system for heart transplantation and the impact on patient survival. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 31(4). 387–397. 89 indexed citations
9.
Smits, Jacqueline M., Wim van der Bij, Dirk Van Raemdonck, et al.. (2010). Defining an extended criteria donor lung: an empirical approach based on the Eurotransplant experience1. Transplant International. 24(4). 393–400. 45 indexed citations
10.
Smits, Jacqueline M., Erwin de Vries, Axel Rahmel, et al.. (2010). Evaluation of the lung allocation score in highly urgent and urgent lung transplant candidates in Eurotransplant. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 30(1). 22–28. 41 indexed citations
11.
Wullstein, C., Guido Woeste, Erwin de Vries, Guido G. Persijn, & Wolf O. Bechstein. (2005). Acceptance Criteria of Pancreas Grafts: How Do Surgeons Decide in Europe?. Transplantation Proceedings. 37(2). 1259–1261. 13 indexed citations
12.
Smits, Jacqueline M., Johan Vanhaecke, Axel Haverich, et al.. (2005). Waiting for a thoracic transplant in Eurotransplant*. Transplant International. 19(1). 54–66. 23 indexed citations
13.
Hoefer, Daniel, et al.. (2005). Elevated donor sodium levels are a risk factor for increased 1-year mortality after heart transplantation. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 24(2). S70–S70. 1 indexed citations
14.
Smits, Jacqueline M., Johan Vanhaecke, Axel Haverich, et al.. (2003). Three-year survival rates for all consecutive heart-only and lung-only transplants performed in Eurotransplant, 1997-1999.. PubMed. 89–100. 32 indexed citations
15.
Persijn, Guido G., et al.. (2002). Trilogy 2001 symposium: tackling the organ shortage problem. Transplantation Proceedings. 34(7). 2553–2555. 1 indexed citations
16.
Doxiadis, Ilias I.N., Peter de Lange, Erwin de Vries, Guido G. Persijn, & F.H.J. Claas. (2001). Protective and susceptible HLA polymorphisms in IgA nephropathy patients with end‐stage renal failure. Tissue Antigens. 57(4). 344–347. 24 indexed citations
17.
Weigel, Hugo M., et al.. (1997). Cotrimoxazole is Effective as Primary Prophylaxis for Toxoplasmic Encephalitis in HIV-infected Patients: A Case Control Study. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases. 29(5). 499–502. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026