Ernst Schrier

16 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers

Ernst Schrier
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 108
  • Rehabilitation 63
  • Pharmacology 119
  • Biomedical Engineering 138
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 51
Replace Tara Jo Manal with:
Tara Jo Manal United States
Arshad Nawaz Malik Pakistan
Joseph G. Wasser United States
Iain C. Todd United Kingdom
Ayman K. Saleh Saudi Arabia
Francisco Esparza-Ros Spain
Rosa María Tapia-Haro Spain
Kılıçhan Bayar Türkiye
Prasath Jayakaran New Zealand
Nicole Petsas Blodgett United States
Ernst Schrier relative to Tara Jo Manal United States Tara Jo Manal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Tara Jo Manal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ernst Schrier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ernst Schrier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ernst Schrier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ernst Schrier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ernst Schrier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ernst Schrier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ernst Schrier. The network helps show where Ernst Schrier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Ernst Schrier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ernst Schrier Line = papers co-authored together Ernst Schrier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201888
2 201439
3 201234
4 201831
5 201430
6 201321
7 200519
8 201917
9 201416
10 201814
11 201813
12 202012
13 201510
14 20176
15 20144
16 20223

About Ernst Schrier

Ernst Schrier is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery, Rehabilitation and Cell Biology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (11 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (7 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (4 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (4 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (3 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (3 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (108 citations), Rehabilitation (63 citations), Pharmacology (119 citations), Biomedical Engineering (138 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (51 citations). Ernst Schrier has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Pieter U. Dijkstra, Jan H. B. Geertzen, Davy Paap, Wilfred F.A. den Dunnen, Jan H. B. Geertzen, Jan de Koning, Hans Rietman, Kitty Rosenbrand, Monica Spruit‐van Eijk and C.P. van Wilgen. Their work appears in journals such as Disability and Rehabilitation, Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine and Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact