Erisa Mwaka
- Surgery top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Co-authors
- Takafumi YayamaHisatoshi BabaShigeru KobayashiKenzo UchidaHideaki NakajimaJoseph OchiengIan G. MunabiRyuichiro Sato
- Topics
- Ethics in Clinical Research (19 papers)Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (16 papers)Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- UgandaJapanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Erisa Mwaka
77 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Surgery 483
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 453
- Pharmacology 274
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 253
- General Health Professions 147
Countries citing papers authored by Erisa Mwaka
This map shows the geographic impact of Erisa Mwaka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erisa Mwaka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erisa Mwaka more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Erisa Mwaka
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erisa Mwaka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erisa Mwaka. The network helps show where Erisa Mwaka may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erisa Mwaka
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erisa Mwaka. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erisa Mwaka based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erisa Mwaka. Erisa Mwaka is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | Mandatory anatomy dissection, effect on examination performance | 2 |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 81 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | Oesophageal perforation in anterior cervical spine plating: A Case report | 1 |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 35 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 33 |
About Erisa Mwaka
Erisa Mwaka is a scholar working on Medical Laboratory Technology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 83 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (19 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (16 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (68 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (453 citations) and Occupational Therapy (89 citations). Erisa Mwaka has collaborated with scholars based in Uganda, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Takafumi Yayama, Hisatoshi Baba, Shigeru Kobayashi, Kenzo Uchida, Hideaki Nakajima, Joseph Ochieng, Ian G. Munabi, Ryuichiro Sato, William Buwembo and Yasuo Kokubo. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Spine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.