Eric S. Sherrer

1.1k citations
9 papers · 539 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Eric S. Sherrer

9 papers receiving 522 citations

Peers

Eric S. Sherrer
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Molecular Biology 422
  • Reproductive Medicine 29
  • Genetics 36
  • Biomedical Engineering 141
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 84
Replace Lakshmi Rambhatla with:
Lakshmi Rambhatla United States
W Kinyanjui Peter Germany
Lai Wen United States
Afroditi Mertzanidou Belgium
Christophe Royer United Kingdom
Deeksha Saxena United States
Xukun Lu China
Gloryn Chia United States
Tristan Frum United States
Eric S. Sherrer relative to Lakshmi Rambhatla United States Lakshmi Rambhatla's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lakshmi Rambhatla · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eric S. Sherrer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric S. Sherrer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric S. Sherrer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric S. Sherrer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric S. Sherrer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric S. Sherrer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric S. Sherrer. The network helps show where Eric S. Sherrer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eric S. Sherrer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eric S. Sherrer Line = papers co-authored together Eric S. Sherrer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2007237
2 200689
3 200561
4 200456
5 200726
6
Factors influencing the commercialisation of cloning in the pork industry.
200623
7 201122
8 200616
9 20149

About Eric S. Sherrer

Eric S. Sherrer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Genetics and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 539 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (5 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (4 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (2 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (2 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (2 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (2 papers) and Biological Activity of Diterpenoids and Biflavonoids (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (422 citations), Reproductive Medicine (29 citations), Genetics (36 citations), Biomedical Engineering (141 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (84 citations). Eric S. Sherrer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Thomas C. Schulz, Sandii N. Brimble, Allan J. Robins, Elizabeth W. Uhl, D. L. Davis, Mahendra S. Rao, Amanda B. McLean, Angelique M. Nelson, Kevin A. D’Amour and C. Anthony Blau. Their work appears in journals such as Stem Cells, BMC Genomics, Organic Letters, Journal of Animal Science and PROTEOMICS.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact