Eric Chicken

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
40 papers, 888 citations indexed

About

Eric Chicken is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Control and Systems Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Eric Chicken has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 888 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Statistics and Probability, 10 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and 9 papers in Control and Systems Engineering. Recurrent topics in Eric Chicken's work include Image and Signal Denoising Methods (10 papers), Fault Detection and Control Systems (9 papers) and Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (7 papers). Eric Chicken is often cited by papers focused on Image and Signal Denoising Methods (10 papers), Fault Detection and Control Systems (9 papers) and Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring (7 papers). Eric Chicken collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and United Kingdom. Eric Chicken's co-authors include Douglas A. Wolfe, Myles Hollander, Joseph J. Pignatiello, James Simpson, Tommaso Cai, Antonio R. Linero, David E. Loper, J. Piekarewicz, Raymond R. Hill and Prabhakar Chalise and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Technometrics and Water Resources Research.

In The Last Decade

Eric Chicken

40 papers receiving 842 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Nonparametric Statistical Methods

2015 472 citations Eric Chicken et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Eric Chicken United States	13	149	129	74	73	67	40	888
Pieter Bastiaan Ober Netherlands	10	96 0.6×	91 0.7×	78 1.1×	49 0.7×	166 2.5×	27	1.6k
Valentin Todorov Austria	12	211 1.4×	100 0.8×	44 0.6×	25 0.3×	105 1.6×	43	792
Wendy L. Martinez United States	11	99 0.7×	86 0.7×	83 1.1×	119 1.6×	233 3.5×	28	1.2k
Alan J. Lee New Zealand	9	144 1.0×	46 0.4×	55 0.7×	54 0.7×	98 1.5×	19	966
Nedret Billor United States	16	308 2.1×	158 1.2×	35 0.5×	38 0.5×	110 1.6×	45	1.1k
Charles L. Dunn United States	7	137 0.9×	58 0.4×	55 0.7×	59 0.8×	137 2.0×	22	1.4k
Robert G. Aykroyd United Kingdom	20	247 1.7×	113 0.9×	40 0.5×	85 1.2×	119 1.8×	72	1.1k
Spencer Graves United States	9	167 1.1×	79 0.6×	54 0.7×	23 0.3×	109 1.6×	24	795
Xiao Su United States	8	97 0.7×	79 0.6×	39 0.5×	32 0.4×	118 1.8×	13	895
James Gorman Australia	5	212 1.4×	73 0.6×	38 0.5×	24 0.3×	86 1.3×	8	808

Countries citing papers authored by Eric Chicken

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Chicken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Chicken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Chicken more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric Chicken

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Chicken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Chicken. The network helps show where Eric Chicken may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eric Chicken

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eric Chicken. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eric Chicken based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eric Chicken. Eric Chicken is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Chicken, Eric, et al.. (2024). Profile Monitoring via Eigenvector Perturbation. Technometrics. 67(2). 283–292. 2 indexed citations

2.

Hill, Raymond R., et al.. (2023). Lightning forecast from chaotic and incomplete time series using wavelet de-noising and spatiotemporal kriging. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(2). 90–102. 1 indexed citations

3.

Hill, Raymond R., et al.. (2021). Wavelet analysis of variance box plot. Journal of Applied Statistics. 49(14). 3536–3563. 19 indexed citations

4.

Chicken, Eric, et al.. (2020). Nonlinear profile monitoring with single index models. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 37(7). 3004–3017. 5 indexed citations

5.

Hill, Raymond R., et al.. (2017). Wavelet ANOVA approach to model validation. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory. 78. 18–27. 13 indexed citations

6.

Hill, Raymond R., et al.. (2017). Dynamic Model Validation Metric Based on Wavelet Thresholded Signals. 2(2). 6 indexed citations

7.

Hill, Raymond R., et al.. (2017). Wavelet ANOVA bisection method for identifying simulation model bias. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory. 80. 66–74. 5 indexed citations

8.

Piekarewicz, J., et al.. (2016). Power of two: Assessing the impact of a second measurement of the weak-charge form factor ofPb208. Physical review. C. 94(3). 41 indexed citations

9.

Sexton, Brittany S., Denis Avey, Daniel L. Vera, et al.. (2013). The spring-loaded genome: Nucleosome redistributions are widespread, transient, and DNA-directed. Genome Research. 24(2). 251–259. 24 indexed citations

10.

Chicken, Eric, et al.. (2011). Investigating Relations between Ability, Preference, and Calculus Performance.. Proceedings of the ... PME Conference. 4 indexed citations

11.

Chicken, Eric, et al.. (2011). Visual thinking and gender differences in high school calculus. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 43(3). 303–313. 15 indexed citations

12.

Chicken, Eric, Joseph J. Pignatiello, & James Simpson. (2009). Statistical process monitoring of nonlinear profiles using wavelets. Quality Engineering. 54(3). 189–192. 1 indexed citations

13.

Loper, David E., et al.. (2008). Probing the Plumbing of Wakulla Spring: Instrumentation and Preliminary Results. 313–324. 1 indexed citations

14.

Loper, David E. & Eric Chicken. (2008). Analysis and Discussion of Karst Conduit Waves. 454–466. 1 indexed citations

15.

Chicken, Eric. (2007). Nonparametric Regression with Sample Design Following a Random Process. Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods. 36(10). 1915–1934. 3 indexed citations

16.

Chicken, Eric, et al.. (2007). Sigma-Sampling Wavelet Denoising for Structural Health Monitoring. 3 indexed citations

17.

Chicken, Eric, et al.. (2007). Estimating tidal effects in spring discharge: A multiscale method using correlated phenomena. Water Resources Research. 43(5). 2 indexed citations

18.

Loper, David E., et al.. (2005). Coastal carbonate aquifer sensitivity to tides. Eos. 86(39). 353–357. 22 indexed citations

19.

Chicken, Eric & Tommaso Cai. (2004). Block thresholding for density estimation: local and global adaptivity. Journal of Multivariate Analysis. 95(1). 76–106. 31 indexed citations

20.

Chicken, Eric. (2002). Block thresholding and wavelet estimation for nonequispaced samples. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference. 116(1). 113–129. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact