Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Dirk Helbing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dirk Helbing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dirk Helbing more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dirk Helbing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dirk Helbing. The network helps show where Dirk Helbing may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dirk Helbing
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dirk Helbing.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dirk Helbing based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dirk Helbing. Dirk Helbing is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ren, Xiao-Long, et al.. (2019). Generalized network dismantling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116(14). 6554–6559.138 indexed citations
Helbing, Dirk, Bruno S. Frey, Gerd Gigerenzer, et al.. (2015). Das Digital Manifest. 5–39.1 indexed citations
9.
Helbing, Dirk. (2014). Crystal Ball and Magic Wand - the Dangerous Promise of Big Data (Chapter 3 of Digital Society). SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
10.
Helbing, Dirk. (2014). How Society Works - Social Order by Self-Organization (Chapter 5 of Digital Society). SSRN Electronic Journal.
11.
Helbing, Dirk. (2014). The World after Big Data: What the Digital Revolution Means for Us. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
12.
Helbing, Dirk. (2014). Social Forces - Revealing the Causes of Success or Disaster (Chapter 6 of Digital Society). SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
13.
Helbing, Dirk. (2013). Globally Networked Risks and How to Respond. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
14.
Chadefaux, Thomas & Dirk Helbing. (2012). The Rationality of Prejudices. PLoS ONE. 7(2). e30902–e30902.5 indexed citations
15.
Tedeschi, Gabriele, Amin Mazloumian, Mauro Gallegati, & Dirk Helbing. (2012). Bankruptcy Cascades in Interbank Markets. Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche).61 indexed citations
16.
Helbing, Dirk, et al.. (2007). Crowd turbulence: the physics of crowd disasters. UCL Discovery (University College London).2 indexed citations
17.
Nagatani, Takashi & Dirk Helbing. (2003). Stabilization of a linear supply chain. arXiv (Cornell University).2 indexed citations
18.
Helbing, Dirk. (2003). A Section-Based Queueing-Theoretical Traffic Model for Congestion and Travel Time Analysis. arXiv (Cornell University).6 indexed citations
19.
Helbing, Dirk, et al.. (2000). Traffic and granular flow '99 : social, traffic, and granular dynamics. Springer eBooks.43 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.