Enrico Marvasi
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Business and International Management top 5%
- Development top 10%
- Co-authors
- Giorgia GiovannettiDavide Del PreteMarco SanfilippoRym AyadiChahir ZakiGiorgio RicchiutiMichele ManciniEnrica Di Stefano
- Topics
- Global trade and economics (19 papers)International Business and FDI (9 papers)Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (6 papers)
In The Last Decade
Enrico Marvasi
23 papers receiving 325 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 225
- Strategy and Management 212
- Economics and Econometrics 195
- Business and International Management 36
- Development 20
Countries citing papers authored by Enrico Marvasi
This map shows the geographic impact of Enrico Marvasi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Enrico Marvasi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Enrico Marvasi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Enrico Marvasi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Enrico Marvasi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Enrico Marvasi. The network helps show where Enrico Marvasi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Enrico Marvasi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Enrico Marvasi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Enrico Marvasi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Enrico Marvasi. Enrico Marvasi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | Trade Networks in the MENA Region | 3 |
| 13 | Esportazioni e e-commerce delle imprese italiane | 1 |
| 14 | 64 | |
| 15 | 82 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 51 |
About Enrico Marvasi
Enrico Marvasi is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Strategy and Management and Development, having authored 23 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global trade and economics (19 papers), International Business and FDI (9 papers) and Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (225 citations), Business and International Management (36 citations) and Strategy and Management (212 citations). Enrico Marvasi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, France and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Giorgia Giovannetti, Davide Del Prete, Marco Sanfilippo, Rym Ayadi, Chahir Zaki, Giorgio Ricchiuti, Michele Mancini, Enrica Di Stefano, Stefano Clò and Barbara Annicchiarico. Their work appears in journals such as Small Business Economics, Food Policy and European Journal of Political Economy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.