Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Citations per year, relative to Engelbert Stockhammer Engelbert Stockhammer (= 1×)
peers
Pierre‐Richard Agénor
Countries citing papers authored by Engelbert Stockhammer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Engelbert Stockhammer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Engelbert Stockhammer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Engelbert Stockhammer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Engelbert Stockhammer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Engelbert Stockhammer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Engelbert Stockhammer. The network helps show where Engelbert Stockhammer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Engelbert Stockhammer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Engelbert Stockhammer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Engelbert Stockhammer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Engelbert Stockhammer. Engelbert Stockhammer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Stockhammer, Engelbert. (2019). An update on Kalecki–Minsky modelling. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies Intervention. 16(2). 179–192.3 indexed citations
6.
Stockhammer, Engelbert, et al.. (2018). Expenditure cascades, low interest Rates, credit deregulation or property booms? Determinants of household debt in OECD countries. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
Onaran, Özlem, et al.. (2011). Stabilising an unequal economy?: Public debt, financial regulation, and income distribution.18 indexed citations
12.
Stockhammer, Engelbert. (2011). Polarisierung der Einkommensverteilung als strukturelle Ursache der gegenwärtigen Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 37(3). 378–402.2 indexed citations
13.
Stockhammer, Engelbert, et al.. (2010). Finanzialisierung und Investitionsverhalten von Industrie-Aktiengesellschaften in Österreich. ePubWU Institutional Repository (Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien). 36(4). 453–479.1 indexed citations
14.
Stockhammer, Engelbert. (2009). Was hat die einkommensverteilung mit der finanzkrise zu tun?. Research Repository (Kingston University London).1 indexed citations
15.
Stockhammer, Engelbert, et al.. (2009). Wie weiter? Zur Zukunft desPostkeynesianismus. WU Research. 35(3). 329–353.
16.
Stockhammer, Engelbert, et al.. (2009). Post-Keynesian economics – how to move forward. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies Intervention. 6(2). 227–246.5 indexed citations
17.
Stockhammer, Engelbert. (2007). Funktionale Einkommensverteilung und aggregierte Nachfrage im Euro-Raum. WU Research. 33(2). 175–198.3 indexed citations
18.
Stockhammer, Engelbert. (2005). Wirtschaftliche Effekte des EU-Beitritts. Ein Literaturüberblick*. WU Research. 31(3). 325–354.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.