Emma Swift

38 total papers · 3.0k total citations
18 papers, 297 citations indexed

About

Emma Swift is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Swift has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 297 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 13 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 9 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Emma Swift's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (13 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (9 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (6 papers). Emma Swift is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (13 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (9 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (6 papers). Emma Swift collaborates with scholars based in Iceland, Canada and Australia. Emma Swift's co-authors include Kathrin Stoll, Helga Zoëga, Kristjana Einarsdóttir, Nichole Fairbrother, Elizabeth Nethery, Patricia A. Janssen, Helga Gottfreðsdóttir, Mechthild M. Groß, Joyce K. Edmonds and Soo Downe and has published in prestigious journals such as Acta Paediatrica, Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica and Birth.

In The Last Decade

Emma Swift

15 papers receiving 289 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Emma Swift 211 153 152 88 36 18 297
Ellise D. Adams 129 0.6× 106 0.7× 138 0.9× 34 0.4× 54 1.5× 25 303
Eva Mautner 169 0.8× 219 1.4× 115 0.8× 45 0.5× 56 1.6× 15 322
Claudia Savard 102 0.5× 152 1.0× 68 0.4× 92 1.0× 25 0.7× 34 295
Elaine Zwelling 194 0.9× 107 0.7× 148 1.0× 38 0.4× 34 0.9× 19 310
Vislava Globevnik Velikonja 103 0.5× 134 0.9× 87 0.6× 78 0.9× 12 0.3× 21 323
Dılek Coşkuner Potur 141 0.7× 229 1.5× 86 0.6× 61 0.7× 13 0.4× 30 349
Gertrud M. Ayerle 205 1.0× 145 0.9× 125 0.8× 76 0.9× 21 0.6× 28 308
Sarah Dib 129 0.6× 138 0.9× 66 0.4× 63 0.7× 100 2.8× 16 262
Kunie Maehara 174 0.8× 275 1.8× 91 0.6× 72 0.8× 71 2.0× 24 341
Gözde Gökçe İşbir 179 0.8× 178 1.2× 111 0.7× 90 1.0× 14 0.4× 34 296

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Swift

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Swift's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Swift with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Swift more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Swift

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Swift. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Swift. The network helps show where Emma Swift may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Swift

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Swift. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Swift based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Swift. Emma Swift is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026