Emma L. Jones
- Surgery
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Oncology
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Co-authors
- Nader FrancisGraham MartinMary Dixon‐WoodsStephen FalkJake FosterNicholas LeesNathan CurtisDavid Messenger
- Topics
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers)Hip and Femur Fractures (3 papers)Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineHealth Information ManagementMedical Laboratory Technology
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesAnnals of SurgeryArteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Emma L. Jones
11 papers receiving 482 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Surgery 210
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 172
- Oncology 108
- General Health Professions 105
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 60
Countries citing papers authored by Emma L. Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma L. Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma L. Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma L. Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma L. Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma L. Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma L. Jones. The network helps show where Emma L. Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma L. Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma L. Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma L. Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma L. Jones. Emma L. Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | Correction: Improving care at scale: Process evaluation of a multi-component quality improvement intervention to reduce mortality after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH trial). [Implement Sci. (2018), 13 (142)] DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0823-9 | 3 |
| 3 | 57 | |
| 4 | 65 | |
| 5 | 42 | |
| 6 | 48 | |
| 7 | 43 | |
| 8 | 39 | |
| 9 | 79 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 91 |
About Emma L. Jones
Emma L. Jones is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Health Information Management and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 11 papers that have together received 497 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (3 papers) and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (172 citations), Health Information Management (27 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (8 citations). Emma L. Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Nader Francis, Graham Martin, Mary Dixon‐Woods, Stephen Falk, Jake Foster, Nicholas Lees, Nathan Curtis, David Messenger, Neil Smart and Carol C. Shoulders. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Annals of Surgery and Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.