Emma L. Jones

765 total citations
11 papers, 497 citations indexed

About

Emma L. Jones is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma L. Jones has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 497 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Surgery, 6 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Emma L. Jones's work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (3 papers) and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (2 papers). Emma L. Jones is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (3 papers) and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (2 papers). Emma L. Jones collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Emma L. Jones's co-authors include Nader Francis, Graham Martin, Mary Dixon‐Woods, Jake Foster, Stephen Falk, Neil Smart, Nathan Curtis, David Messenger, Nicholas Lees and Carol C. Shoulders and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Annals of Surgery and Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology.

In The Last Decade

Emma L. Jones

11 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emma L. Jones United Kingdom 10 210 172 108 105 60 11 497
Joel M. Kupfer United States 13 103 0.5× 178 1.0× 69 0.6× 129 1.2× 101 1.7× 19 625
Jaime D. Lewis United States 12 136 0.6× 165 1.0× 59 0.5× 39 0.4× 65 1.1× 42 581
Clarissa Garcia Rodrigues Brazil 12 87 0.4× 113 0.7× 59 0.5× 39 0.4× 24 0.4× 27 365
Tomas Sjöberg Bexelius Sweden 13 144 0.7× 46 0.3× 99 0.9× 32 0.3× 45 0.8× 29 435
Shrilla Banerjee United Kingdom 11 110 0.5× 216 1.3× 30 0.3× 61 0.6× 24 0.4× 28 450
Jonathan Aning United Kingdom 15 213 1.0× 99 0.6× 142 1.3× 69 0.7× 25 0.4× 61 745
Emily Cohen Netherlands 10 213 1.0× 57 0.3× 18 0.2× 58 0.6× 105 1.8× 18 455
Peter F. Schnatz United States 16 136 0.6× 55 0.3× 131 1.2× 105 1.0× 142 2.4× 45 805
Lillian Wang United States 8 145 0.7× 26 0.2× 93 0.9× 49 0.5× 49 0.8× 15 579
Clara Fitzgerald United States 11 79 0.4× 73 0.4× 79 0.7× 35 0.3× 46 0.8× 22 379

Countries citing papers authored by Emma L. Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma L. Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma L. Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma L. Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma L. Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma L. Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma L. Jones. The network helps show where Emma L. Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma L. Jones

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma L. Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma L. Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma L. Jones. Emma L. Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Jones, Emma L., Mary Dixon‐Woods, & Graham Martin. (2019). Why is reporting quality improvement so hard? A qualitative study in perioperative care. BMJ Open. 9(7). e030269–e030269. 15 indexed citations
2.
Stephens, Tim, Carol J. Peden, Rupert M. Pearse, et al.. (2018). Correction: Improving care at scale: Process evaluation of a multi-component quality improvement intervention to reduce mortality after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH trial). [Implement Sci. (2018), 13 (142)] DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0823-9. Implementation Science. 13. 3 indexed citations
3.
Stephens, Tim, Carol J. Peden, Rupert M. Pearse, et al.. (2018). Improving care at scale: process evaluation of a multi-component quality improvement intervention to reduce mortality after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH trial). Implementation Science. 13(1). 142–142. 57 indexed citations
4.
Messenger, David, et al.. (2016). Factors predicting outcome from enhanced recovery programmes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Surgical Endoscopy. 31(5). 2050–2071. 65 indexed citations
5.
Jones, Emma L., Nicholas Lees, Graham Martin, & Mary Dixon‐Woods. (2016). How Well Is Quality Improvement Described in the Perioperative Care Literature? A Systematic Review. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 42(5). 196–AP10. 42 indexed citations
6.
Hignett, Sue, et al.. (2015). Human factors and ergonomics and quality improvement science: integrating approaches for safety in healthcare. BMJ Quality & Safety. 24(4). 250–254. 48 indexed citations
7.
Jones, Emma L., et al.. (2014). Quality of Reporting on Patient and Public Involvement Within Surgical Research. Annals of Surgery. 261(2). 243–250. 43 indexed citations
8.
Aikio, Mari, Harri Elamaa, David Vicente, et al.. (2014). Specific collagen XVIII isoforms promote adipose tissue accrual via mechanisms determining adipocyte number and affect fat deposition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111(30). E3043–52. 39 indexed citations
9.
Foster, Jake, et al.. (2013). Timing of Surgery After Long-Course Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 56(7). 921–930. 79 indexed citations
10.
Jones, Emma L., Odd Bjarte Nilsen, David Lowery, et al.. (2012). Analysis of Neuron-Specific Enolase and S100B as Biomarkers of Cognitive Decline Following Surgery in Older People. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders. 34(5-6). 307–311. 15 indexed citations
11.
Eichenbaum‐Voline, Sophie, Michael Olivier, Emma L. Jones, et al.. (2003). Linkage and Association Between Distinct Variants of the APOA1/C3/A4/A5 Gene Cluster and Familial Combined Hyperlipidemia. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology. 24(1). 167–174. 91 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026