Emma Helm

2.2k citations
24 papers · 344 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Helm

23 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers

Emma Helm
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 89
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 259
  • Internal Medicine 23
  • Emergency Medical Services 31
  • Health Informatics 4
Replace Naoko Kawata with:
Naoko Kawata Japan
Tullio Manca Italy
Renato Vitiello Italy
Bruce N. Brent United States
N. Sreeram Germany
Calvin Huang United States
Sze Mun Mak United Kingdom
Wissam Abouzgheib United States
Ivan Co United States
Asser M. Youssef United States
Emma Helm relative to Naoko Kawata Japan Naoko Kawata's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Naoko Kawata · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Helm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Helm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Helm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Helm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Helm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Helm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Helm. The network helps show where Emma Helm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Helm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Helm Line = papers co-authored together Emma Helm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200752
2 201348
3 200934
4 201030
5 200921
6 201019
7 201518
8 200917
9 201117
10 202415
11 200813
12 200811
13 202111
14 201111
15 201610
16 20253
17 20153
18 20073
19 20112
20 20082

About Emma Helm

Emma Helm is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Transplantation and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 24 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases (8 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (4 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (3 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (3 papers) and Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (89 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (259 citations), Internal Medicine (23 citations), Emergency Medical Services (31 citations) and Health Informatics (4 citations). Emma Helm has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Fergus Gleeson, Najib M. Rahman, Omid Talakoub, Anne L. Stephenson, E.F. Nash, Elizabeth Tullis, Tahreema Matin, Paul Babyn, Doreen Engelberts and Rosario Francesco Grasso. Their work appears in journals such as Thorax, Health Technology Assessment, Investigative Radiology, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Clinical Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026