Emma Daulton

872 citations
28 papers · 646 · h-index 15

Impact in

    • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
    • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Papers in

Emma Daulton

27 papers receiving 640 citations

Peers

Emma Daulton
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Sensory Systems 76
  • Spectroscopy 168
  • Biomedical Engineering 445
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 68
  • Insect Science 46
Replace Michael Cauchi with:
Michael Cauchi United Kingdom
Livia Malorni Italy
Jonas W. Perez United States
Kaja Tikk Germany
Amna Jabbar Siddiqui Pakistan
Lester A. Wilson United States
Maryline Parmentier France
Chen Fang China
E Fischer Hungary
Takumi Sato Japan
Emma Daulton relative to Michael Cauchi United Kingdom Michael Cauchi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Michael Cauchi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Daulton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Daulton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Daulton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Daulton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Daulton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Daulton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Daulton. The network helps show where Emma Daulton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Daulton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Daulton Line = papers co-authored together Emma Daulton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202070
2 202267
3 201862
4 201557
5 201950
6 202145
7 202138
8 202134
9 201630
10 202027
11 202024
12 201521
13 201921
14 202019
15 202018
16 202313
17 201912
18 20208
19 20248
20 20227

About Emma Daulton

Emma Daulton is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 646 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (22 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (7 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (7 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (4 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (3 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (3 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (76 citations), Spectroscopy (168 citations), Biomedical Engineering (445 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (68 citations) and Insect Science (46 citations). Emma Daulton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include James A. Covington, Ramesh Arasaradnam, Alfian Wicaksono, Ayman Bannaga, Akira Tiele, Richard S. Savage, Chuka Nwokolo, Michael McFarlane, Tatjana Crnogorac‐Jurcevic and Hemant M. Kocher. Their work appears in journals such as Biosensors, Colorectal Disease, Sensors, Digestive and Liver Disease and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact