Emma Carduff

1.5k citations
40 papers · 988 indexed · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Carduff

38 papers receiving 972 citations

Peers

Emma Carduff
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 530
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 85
  • General Health Professions 355
  • Clinical Psychology 280
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 36
Replace Atsushi Asai with:
Atsushi Asai Japan
Patricia Berry United States
Alireza Irajpour Iran
Anna Green Australia
Lesley Baillie United Kingdom
Faith Hopp United States
Nahid Dehghan‐Nayeri Iran
Sally Borbasi Australia
Anna Lloyd United Kingdom
Shigeko Izumi United States
Emma Carduff relative to Atsushi Asai Japan Atsushi Asai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Atsushi Asai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Carduff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Carduff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Carduff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Carduff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Carduff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Carduff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Carduff. The network helps show where Emma Carduff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Carduff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Carduff Line = papers co-authored together Emma Carduff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20233
3 202241
4 20226
5 20224
6 202215
7 20223
8 202133
9 202148
10 20212
11 20212
12 20199
13 201818
14 201837
15 20188
16
Why do older people get less palliative care than younger people
201617
17 201541
18 201570
19 201477
20 2009160

About Emma Carduff

Emma Carduff is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Gastroenterology and Complementary and Manual Therapy, having authored 40 papers that have together received 988 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (28 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (16 papers), Family Support in Illness (7 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (7 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (5 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (3 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (530 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (85 citations), General Health Professions (355 citations), Clinical Psychology (280 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (36 citations). Emma Carduff has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Marilyn Kendall, Anna Lloyd, Scott Murray, Debbie Cavers, Aziz Sheikh, Scott A Murray, Liz Grant, Alison Worth, Fiona Harris and Anne Finucane. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, Palliative Medicine, BMC Palliative Care, BMC Family Practice and Palliative Care and Social Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026