Emma Bird

1.2k citations
41 papers · 891 indexed · h-index 16

Emma Bird

40 papers receiving 860 citations

Peers

Emma Bird
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Transportation 201
  • Applied Psychology 129
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 24
  • Health 80
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 252
Replace Rachel Carey with:
Rachel Carey United Kingdom
Nyssa Hadgraft Australia
Dyann Matson-Koffman United States
Sara Veblen‐Mortenson United States
Andrew James Williams United Kingdom
Sarah Forberger Germany
Anna M. Adachi‐Mejia United States
Lisa Bailey‐Davis United States
Sofie Compernolle Belgium
Meghan R. Longacre United States
Emma Bird relative to Rachel Carey United Kingdom Rachel Carey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Rachel Carey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Bird

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Bird's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Bird with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Bird more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Bird

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Bird. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Bird. The network helps show where Emma Bird may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Bird, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Bird Line = papers co-authored together Emma Bird links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202310
2 202110
3 202010
4 20197
5 201828
6 201831
7 201811
8 201868
9 201717
10 20176
11 201713
12 201611
13 201638
14 201619
15 201570
16
Health economic assessment of walking and cycling interventions in the physical environment: Interim findings from the iConnect study
20142
17 201415
18 2013135
19 201383
20 201332

About Emma Bird

Emma Bird is a scholar working on Transportation, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Applied Psychology and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 891 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Children's Physical and Motor Development (9 papers), Physical Activity and Health (9 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (7 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (6 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (5 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (4 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (4 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transportation (201 citations), Applied Psychology (129 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (24 citations), Health (80 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (252 citations). Emma Bird has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Nepal. Frequent co-authors include Jane Powell, David Ogilvie, Graham Baker, Paul Pilkington, Janet Ige, Simon J. Sebire, Nanette Mutrie, Shannon Sahlqvist, Russell Jago and Phillippa C. Diedrichs. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Public Health, Journal of Transport & Health, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Public Health and Social enterprise journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026