Emily Weiss

1.4k total citations
31 papers, 893 citations indexed

About

Emily Weiss is a scholar working on Genetics, Small Animals and Geography, Planning and Development. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Weiss has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 893 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Genetics, 16 papers in Small Animals and 16 papers in Geography, Planning and Development. Recurrent topics in Emily Weiss's work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (26 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (16 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (15 papers). Emily Weiss is often cited by papers focused on Human-Animal Interaction Studies (26 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (16 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (15 papers). Emily Weiss collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Emily Weiss's co-authors include Margaret R. Slater, Katherine A. Miller, Emily Dolan, Gary Greenberg, Linda K. Lord, Janine L. Brown, Elizabeth W. Freeman, C. Victor Spain, S Zawistowski and Janet M. Scarlett and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Applied Animal Behaviour Science.

In The Last Decade

Emily Weiss

31 papers receiving 830 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily Weiss United States 19 790 425 279 179 126 31 893
Alexandra Protopopova Canada 17 730 0.9× 428 1.0× 205 0.7× 144 0.8× 66 0.5× 53 864
Rebecca Ruch-Gallie United States 11 814 1.0× 400 0.9× 273 1.0× 247 1.4× 37 0.3× 17 999
Linda C. Marston Australia 12 621 0.8× 301 0.7× 238 0.9× 170 0.9× 42 0.3× 17 650
Anthony L. Podberscek United Kingdom 17 856 1.1× 443 1.0× 183 0.7× 166 0.9× 75 0.6× 27 1.1k
Gillian Diesel United Kingdom 12 599 0.8× 333 0.8× 164 0.6× 159 0.9× 46 0.4× 20 781
Jaume Fatjó Spain 21 1.1k 1.4× 521 1.2× 175 0.6× 274 1.5× 60 0.5× 57 1.3k
Vanessa Rohlf Australia 12 614 0.8× 280 0.7× 139 0.5× 141 0.8× 48 0.4× 27 804
Emily Blackwell United Kingdom 15 983 1.2× 595 1.4× 156 0.6× 243 1.4× 64 0.5× 44 1.2k
Linda K. Lord United States 22 788 1.0× 495 1.2× 174 0.6× 189 1.1× 108 0.9× 40 1.2k
Mandy Paterson Australia 16 492 0.6× 235 0.6× 151 0.5× 148 0.8× 62 0.5× 44 567

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Weiss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Weiss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Weiss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Weiss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Weiss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Weiss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Weiss. The network helps show where Emily Weiss may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Weiss

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Weiss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Weiss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Weiss. Emily Weiss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ohta, Ryuichi, et al.. (2022). Relationship between Dysphagia and Home Discharge among Older Patients Receiving Hospital Rehabilitation in Rural Japan: A Retrospective Cohort Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(16). 10125–10125. 12 indexed citations
2.
Dolan, Emily, et al.. (2018). The Impact of Excluding Food Guarding from a Standardized Behavioral Canine Assessment in Animal Shelters. Animals. 8(2). 27–27. 13 indexed citations
3.
Dolan, Emily, Emily Weiss, & Margaret R. Slater. (2017). Welfare Impacts of Spay/Neuter-Focused Outreach on Companion Animals in New York City Public Housing. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 20(3). 257–272. 8 indexed citations
4.
Weiss, Emily, Lina Zgaga, Stephanie H. Read, et al.. (2016). Farming, Foreign Holidays, and Vitamin D in Orkney. PLoS ONE. 11(5). e0155633–e0155633. 5 indexed citations
5.
Weiss, Emily, et al.. (2014). Evaluation of a Novel Dog Adoption Program in Two US Communities. PLoS ONE. 9(3). e91959–e91959. 23 indexed citations
6.
Weiss, Emily, et al.. (2014). What Do People Want? Factors People Consider When Acquiring Dogs, the Complexity of the Choices They Make, and Implications for Nonhuman Animal Relocation Programs. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 18(1). 57–73. 24 indexed citations
7.
Miller, Gregory S., Margaret R. Slater, & Emily Weiss. (2014). Effects of a Geographically-Targeted Intervention and Creative Outreach to Reduce Shelter Intake in Portland, Oregon. Open Journal of Animal Sciences. 4(4). 165–174. 9 indexed citations
8.
Weiss, Emily, et al.. (2014). Do Policy Based Adoptions Increase the Care a Pet Receives? An Exploration of a Shift to Conversation Based Adoptions at One Shelter. Open Journal of Animal Sciences. 4(5). 313–322. 6 indexed citations
9.
Weiss, Emily, et al.. (2013). Community Partnering as a Tool for Improving Live Release Rate in Animal Shelters in the United States. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 16(3). 221–238. 21 indexed citations
10.
11.
Weiss, Emily, et al.. (2013). Should Dogs and Cats be Given as Gifts?. Animals. 3(4). 995–1001. 11 indexed citations
12.
Weiss, Emily, et al.. (2012). Preliminary Investigation of Food Guarding Behavior in Shelter Dogs in the United States. Animals. 2(3). 331–346. 31 indexed citations
13.
Weiss, Emily, Margaret R. Slater, & Linda K. Lord. (2012). Frequency of Lost Dogs and Cats in the United States and the Methods Used to Locate Them. Animals. 2(2). 301–315. 41 indexed citations
14.
Weiss, Emily, Margaret R. Slater, & Linda K. Lord. (2011). Retention of provided identification for dogs and cats seen in veterinary clinics and adopted from shelters in Oklahoma City, OK, USA. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 101(3-4). 265–269. 12 indexed citations
15.
Miller, Katherine A., et al.. (2010). Factors Relevant to Adoption of Cats in an Animal Shelter. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 13(2). 174–179. 53 indexed citations
16.
Weiss, Emily, et al.. (2009). A Comparison of Attachment Levels of Adopters of Cats: Fee-Based Adoptions Versus Free Adoptions. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 12(4). 360–370. 21 indexed citations
17.
Freeman, Elizabeth W., Emily Weiss, & Janine L. Brown. (2004). Examination of the interrelationships of behavior, dominance status, and ovarian activity in captive Asian and African elephants. Zoo Biology. 23(5). 431–448. 55 indexed citations
18.
Weiss, Emily, et al.. (2003). The Use of Classical and Operant Conditioning in Training Aldabra Tortoises (Geochelone gigantea) for Venipuncture and Other Husbandry Issues. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 6(1). 33–38. 26 indexed citations
19.
Weiss, Emily. (2002). Selecting Shelter Dogs for Service Dog Training. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 5(1). 43–62. 20 indexed citations
20.
Weiss, Emily & Gary Greenberg. (1997). Service dog selection tests: Effectiveness for dogs from animal shelters. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 53(4). 297–308. 69 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alexandra Protopopova Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rebecca Ruch-Gallie Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Linda C. Marston Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anthony L. Podberscek Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gillian Diesel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jaume Fatjó Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Vanessa Rohlf Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Emily Blackwell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Linda K. Lord Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mandy Paterson
Rankless by CCL
2026