Emily Taylor

25 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers

Emily Taylor
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 144
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 78
  • Gastroenterology 26
  • Epidemiology 126
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 5
Replace Rajna Knez with:
Rajna Knez Sweden
John W. Lace United States
Sunny Kalsy United Kingdom
Louise Robinson United Kingdom
Kimberly R. Laurene United States
Henry Kwok China
Suzanne Hodge United Kingdom
Melody A. Graham United States
Heidi E. Hamilton United States
Seyed Kaveh Hojjat Iran
Emily Taylor relative to Rajna Knez Sweden Rajna Knez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Rajna Knez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Taylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Taylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Taylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Taylor. The network helps show where Emily Taylor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Taylor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Taylor Line = papers co-authored together Emily Taylor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202044
2 201339
3 202338
4 201332
5 201229
6 202028
7 201228
8 202026
9 200821
10 202120
11
A Better Life - What Older People With High Support Needs Value
201119
12 202119
13 202117
14 201316
15 202215
16 202013
17
The Privatization of Human Rights: Illusions of Consent, Automation and Neutrality
20167
18 19816
19 20226
20 20213

About Emily Taylor

Emily Taylor is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 436 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (8 papers), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (6 papers), Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (2 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (144 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (78 citations), Gastroenterology (26 citations), Epidemiology (126 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (5 citations). Emily Taylor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Miriam H. Labbok, Punit Shah, Lucy A. Livingston, Mitchell J. Callan, Nathan Nickel, Chris Ashwin, Karen Anderson, Virginia Dickson‐Swift, Marsha Walker and Paige Hall Smith. Their work appears in journals such as International Breastfeeding Journal, Autism, Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Midwifery and Psychology of Religion and Spirituality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact