Emily Stark

16 total papers · 502 total citations
14 papers, 277 citations indexed

About

Emily Stark is a scholar working on Information Systems, Signal Processing and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Stark has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 277 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Information Systems, 6 papers in Signal Processing and 5 papers in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in Emily Stark's work include Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (6 papers), Spam and Phishing Detection (5 papers) and Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (4 papers). Emily Stark is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (6 papers), Spam and Phishing Detection (5 papers) and Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (4 papers). Emily Stark collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Emily Stark's co-authors include Dan Boneh, Scott Klemmer, Michael Hamburg, Raluca Ada Popa, Nickolai Zeldovich, Hari Balakrishnan, M. Frans Kaashoek, Adrienne Porter Felt, Parisa Tabriz and Collin Jackson and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Security & Privacy, Networked Systems Design and Implementation and Network and Distributed System Security Symposium.

In The Last Decade

Emily Stark

14 papers receiving 259 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Emily Stark 156 152 81 57 49 14 277
Beth Trushkowsky 134 0.9× 140 0.9× 118 1.5× 27 0.5× 35 0.7× 11 306
Mark Gondree 165 1.1× 195 1.3× 120 1.5× 40 0.7× 44 0.9× 16 314
Muhammad Ahmad Bashir 153 1.0× 186 1.2× 101 1.2× 72 1.3× 119 2.4× 10 305
Georgios Pitsilis 225 1.4× 151 1.0× 115 1.4× 60 1.1× 34 0.7× 11 328
Suhas Ranganath 128 0.8× 188 1.2× 45 0.6× 16 0.3× 38 0.8× 19 302
Yih-Farn Robin Chen 99 0.6× 100 0.7× 85 1.0× 21 0.4× 37 0.8× 11 265
Edward Benson 159 1.0× 149 1.0× 87 1.1× 25 0.4× 29 0.6× 16 317
Peter Snyder 119 0.8× 138 0.9× 36 0.4× 74 1.3× 78 1.6× 20 211
Tam The Nguyen 73 0.5× 251 1.7× 57 0.7× 72 1.3× 50 1.0× 17 313
Uri Hanani 147 0.9× 208 1.4× 35 0.4× 36 0.6× 53 1.1× 8 308

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Stark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Stark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Stark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Stark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Stark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Stark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Stark. The network helps show where Emily Stark may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Stark

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Stark. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Stark based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Stark. Emily Stark is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026