Emily St Denny

636 total citations
26 papers, 306 citations indexed

About

Emily St Denny is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily St Denny has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 306 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 8 papers in General Health Professions and 6 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Emily St Denny's work include Social Policy and Reform Studies (13 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (6 papers) and European Union Policy and Governance (3 papers). Emily St Denny is often cited by papers focused on Social Policy and Reform Studies (13 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (6 papers) and European Union Policy and Governance (3 papers). Emily St Denny collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and United States. Emily St Denny's co-authors include Paul Cairney, Heather Mitchell, John Boswell, Steve Martin, Michael Keating, Philippe Zittoun, Steve Martin, Simon Capewell, Ffion Lloyd‐Williams and Martín O’Flaherty and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Science & Medicine and International Journal of Social Research Methodology.

In The Last Decade

Emily St Denny

25 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily St Denny United Kingdom 10 108 104 70 61 35 26 306
Antonia Maioni Canada 10 133 1.2× 125 1.2× 35 0.5× 55 0.9× 18 0.5× 29 303
Michael S. Sparer United States 11 66 0.6× 176 1.7× 42 0.6× 41 0.7× 18 0.5× 30 327
Thomas Leoni Austria 8 49 0.5× 102 1.0× 31 0.4× 66 1.1× 12 0.3× 50 267
S. Akbar Zaidi Pakistan 10 79 0.7× 67 0.6× 20 0.3× 115 1.9× 16 0.5× 36 324
Bonnie E. Glaser United States 4 72 0.7× 111 1.1× 26 0.4× 102 1.7× 11 0.3× 7 315
Christopher J. Jewell United States 7 65 0.6× 158 1.5× 22 0.3× 61 1.0× 7 0.2× 9 301
Michael J. Licari United States 7 64 0.6× 40 0.4× 39 0.6× 56 0.9× 17 0.5× 11 293
Ingrid Esser Sweden 7 73 0.7× 153 1.5× 33 0.5× 75 1.2× 38 1.1× 15 244
Jake Haselswerdt United States 10 150 1.4× 87 0.8× 16 0.2× 74 1.2× 23 0.7× 26 284
Mrigesh Bhatia United Kingdom 6 40 0.4× 79 0.8× 16 0.2× 72 1.2× 18 0.5× 14 238

Countries citing papers authored by Emily St Denny

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily St Denny's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily St Denny with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily St Denny more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily St Denny

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily St Denny. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily St Denny. The network helps show where Emily St Denny may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily St Denny

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily St Denny. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily St Denny based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily St Denny. Emily St Denny is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cairney, Paul, et al.. (2025). Policy process theories in Europe: A survey of who uses them, where, and why. European Policy Analysis. 11(2). 168–190. 3 indexed citations
2.
Denny, Emily St & Philippe Zittoun. (2024). Handbook of Teaching Public Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks. 8 indexed citations
3.
Cairney, Paul, et al.. (2022). Public Policy to Reduce Inequalities across Europe. 18 indexed citations
4.
Cairney, Paul, Emily St Denny, & John Boswell. (2022). Why is health improvement policy so difficult to secure?. Open Research Europe. 2. 76–76. 2 indexed citations
5.
Cairney, Paul, et al.. (2022). Public Policy to Reduce Inequalities across Europe:Hope versus Reality. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). 2 indexed citations
6.
Cairney, Paul, Emily St Denny, & John Boswell. (2022). Why is health improvement policy so difficult to secure?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. 76–76. 9 indexed citations
7.
Cairney, Paul, et al.. (2021). Policy design for territorial equity in multi‐level and multi‐sectoral political systems: Comparing health and education strategies. Regional Science Policy & Practice. 14(5). 1051–1062. 7 indexed citations
8.
Cairney, Paul, Emily St Denny, & Heather Mitchell. (2021). The future of public health policymaking after COVID-19: a qualitative systematic review of lessons from Health in All Policies. Open Research Europe. 1. 23–23. 22 indexed citations
9.
Cairney, Paul, Emily St Denny, & Heather Mitchell. (2021). The future of public health policymaking after COVID-19: a qualitative systematic review of lessons from Health in All Policies. Open Research Europe. 1. 23–23. 29 indexed citations
10.
Denny, Emily St, et al.. (2021). How can subnational governments develop and deliver distinctive policy agendas?. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 88(4). 1159–1175. 5 indexed citations
11.
Cairney, Paul, et al.. (2020). Policy learning to reduce inequalities: the search for a coherent Scottish gender mainstreaming policy in a multilevel UK. Territory Politics Governance. 9(3). 412–433. 18 indexed citations
12.
Lloyd‐Williams, Ffion, Rebecca Masters, Lirije Hyseni, et al.. (2020). The QUEST for Effective and Equitable Policies to Prevent Non-communicable Diseases: Co-Production Lessons From Stakeholder Workshops. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 10(10). 638–646. 7 indexed citations
13.
Cairney, Paul & Emily St Denny. (2020). Why Isn't Government Policy More Preventive?. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). 47 indexed citations
14.
Martin, Steve, et al.. (2019). Can meso-governments use metagovernance tools to tackle complex policy problems?. Policy & Politics. 47(3). 437–454. 9 indexed citations
15.
Boswell, John, Paul Cairney, & Emily St Denny. (2019). The politics of institutionalizing preventive health. Social Science & Medicine. 228. 202–210. 18 indexed citations
16.
Denny, Emily St. (2018). Kittens are evil: Little heresies in public policy. Local Government Studies. 44(3). 438–441. 4 indexed citations
17.
Denny, Emily St. (2017). The gradual transformation of a weak but enduring regime: contemporary French prostitution policy in transition (1946–2016). Modern & Contemporary France. 25(3). 299–314. 4 indexed citations
18.
Glencross, Andrew & Emily St Denny. (2017). Remain or Leave? Reflections on the pedagogical and informative value of a Massive Open Online Course on the 2016 UK referendum on EU membership. Journal of Contemporary European Research. 13(4). 1 indexed citations
19.
20.
Cairney, Paul & Emily St Denny. (2014). What is Qualitative Research (Bloomsbury). International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 18(1). 117–125. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026