Emily Sinclair

64 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Emily Sinclair
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 120
  • Radiation 129
  • Oncology 379
  • Surgery 519
  • Genetics 113
Replace Shaelyn Culleton with:
Shaelyn Culleton Canada
Luluel Khan Canada
Edward Chow Canada
Sean R. Smith United States
T. Pignon France
I. Henrı́quez Spain
Carol White United States
Stephen Rush United States
M. Rees United Kingdom
Derek Wilke Canada
Emily Sinclair relative to Shaelyn Culleton Canada Shaelyn Culleton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Shaelyn Culleton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Sinclair

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Sinclair's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Sinclair with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Sinclair more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Sinclair

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Sinclair. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Sinclair. The network helps show where Emily Sinclair may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Sinclair, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Sinclair Line = papers co-authored together Emily Sinclair links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200989
2 200574
3 200956
4 200856
5 200650
6 200946
7 201043
8 200941
9 200836
10 200733
11 200833
12 200830
13 200730
14 200629
15 200625
16 200724
17 200924
18 200923
19 201022
20 201620

About Emily Sinclair

Emily Sinclair is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management of metastatic bone disease (38 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (12 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (12 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (9 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (8 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (6 papers) and Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (120 citations), Radiation (129 citations), Oncology (379 citations), Surgery (519 citations) and Genetics (113 citations). Emily Sinclair has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Edward Chow, Cyril Danjoux, May Tsao, Elizabeth Barnes, Amanda Hird, Liying Zhang, Kristin Harris, Sean Symons, Jennifer Wong and Nicole Bradley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Palliative Medicine, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Supportive Care in Cancer, Clinical Oncology and Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact