Emily Sightes

502 total citations
16 papers, 329 citations indexed

About

Emily Sightes is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Sightes has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 329 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in General Health Professions, 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Emily Sightes's work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (7 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers). Emily Sightes is often cited by papers focused on Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (7 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers). Emily Sightes collaborates with scholars based in United States. Emily Sightes's co-authors include Bradley Ray, Philip Huynh, Dennis P. Watson, Grant Victor, Evan M. Lowder, Brandon del Pozo, Jeremiah Goulka, Leo Beletsky, Daniel O’Donnell and Eric Grommon and has published in prestigious journals such as Addiction, Drug and Alcohol Dependence and Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment.

In The Last Decade

Emily Sightes

16 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emily Sightes United States	11	190	172	96	78	75	16	329
Grant Victor United States	11	219 1.2×	187 1.1×	74 0.8×	64 0.8×	57 0.8×	38	340
María Luisa Mittal United States	15	344 1.8×	418 2.4×	77 0.8×	100 1.3×	58 0.8×	33	542
Sasha Mital United States	8	156 0.8×	170 1.0×	44 0.5×	85 1.1×	41 0.5×	12	270
Shelley Cogger Australia	9	86 0.5×	177 1.0×	82 0.9×	61 0.8×	74 1.0×	24	278
Anne Siegler United States	8	176 0.9×	225 1.3×	134 1.4×	45 0.6×	30 0.4×	13	370
Cody Callon Canada	9	152 0.8×	174 1.0×	89 0.9×	62 0.8×	44 0.6×	12	313
Miles Morris United States	12	259 1.4×	258 1.5×	46 0.5×	52 0.7×	41 0.5×	27	376
Frishta Nafeh Canada	9	198 1.0×	191 1.1×	93 1.0×	36 0.5×	76 1.0×	14	338
Renae Fomiatti Australia	13	152 0.8×	244 1.4×	168 1.8×	79 1.0×	76 1.0×	26	433
Kristen Ochoa United States	8	269 1.4×	461 2.7×	86 0.9×	45 0.6×	54 0.7×	11	583

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Sightes

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Sightes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Sightes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Sightes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Sightes

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Sightes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Sightes. The network helps show where Emily Sightes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Sightes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Sightes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Sightes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Sightes. Emily Sightes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

16 of 16 papers shown

1.

Sightes, Emily, et al.. (2023). Study protocol and stakeholder perceptions of a randomized controlled trial of a co-response police-mental health team. Journal of Experimental Criminology. 21(2). 465–486. 3 indexed citations

2.

Ray, Bradley, Matthew C. Aalsma, Nickolas Zaller, Erin Comartin, & Emily Sightes. (2022). The Perpetual Blind Spot in Public Health Surveillance. Journal of Correctional Health Care. 28(6). 391–395. 2 indexed citations

3.

Victor, Grant, et al.. (2021). Crisis event dispositions following a crisis response team intervention.. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 44(4). 310–317. 3 indexed citations

4.

Huynh, Philip, et al.. (2021). Community overdose surveillance: Comparing substances collected from the death scene investigation to toxicology results. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 224. 108722–108722. 16 indexed citations

5.

Victor, Grant, et al.. (2021). Jail and overdose: assessing the community impact of incarceration on overdose. Addiction. 117(2). 433–441. 33 indexed citations

6.

Ray, Bradley, Dennis P. Watson, Huiping Xu, et al.. (2021). Peer recovery services for persons returning from prison: Pilot randomized clinical trial investigation of SUPPORT. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 126. 108339–108339. 31 indexed citations

7.

Pozo, Brandon del, Emily Sightes, Jeremiah Goulka, et al.. (2021). Police discretion in encounters with people who use drugs: operationalizing the theory of planned behavior. Harm Reduction Journal. 18(1). 132–132. 48 indexed citations

8.

Victor, Grant, et al.. (2021). Designing and implementing an intervention for returning citizens living with substance use disorder: discovering the benefits of peer recovery coach involvement in pilot clinical trial decision-making. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation. 60(2). 138–158. 16 indexed citations

9.

Pozo, Brandon del, et al.. (2021). Can touch this: training to correct police officer beliefs about overdose from incidental contact with fentanyl. Health & Justice. 9(1). 34–34. 21 indexed citations

10.

Comartin, Erin, et al.. (2020). Comparing For-Profit and Nonprofit Mental Health Services in County Jails. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 48(2). 320–329. 3 indexed citations

11.

Lowder, Evan M., et al.. (2020). Two‐year outcomes following naloxone administration by police officers or emergency medical services personnel. Criminology & Public Policy. 19(3). 1019–1040. 22 indexed citations

12.

Sightes, Emily, et al.. (2019). Police officer attitudes towards syringe services programming. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 205. 107617–107617. 11 indexed citations

13.

Watson, Dennis P., Alan B. McGuire, Huiping Xu, et al.. (2019). Replication of an emergency department-based recovery coaching intervention and pilot testing of pragmatic trial protocols within the context of Indiana's Opioid State Targeted Response plan. Publisher. 2 indexed citations

14.

Watson, Dennis P., Alan B. McGuire, Huiping Xu, et al.. (2019). Replication of an emergency department-based recovery coaching intervention and pilot testing of pragmatic trial protocols within the context of Indiana's Opioid State Targeted Response plan. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 108. 88–94. 37 indexed citations

15.

Ray, Bradley, et al.. (2018). Barriers and facilitators to implementing an urban co-responding police-mental health team. Health & Justice. 6(1). 21–21. 45 indexed citations

16.

Watson, Dennis P., et al.. (2018). Lay responder naloxone access and Good Samaritan law compliance: postcard survey results from 20 Indiana counties. Harm Reduction Journal. 15(1). 18–18. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact