Emily Siegel

562 total citations
13 papers, 377 citations indexed

About

Emily Siegel is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Siegel has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 377 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cancer Research, 6 papers in Oncology and 5 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Emily Siegel's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (8 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (5 papers) and Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (3 papers). Emily Siegel is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (8 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (5 papers) and Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (3 papers). Emily Siegel collaborates with scholars based in United States and China. Emily Siegel's co-authors include Armando E. Giuliano, Liting Jin, Bingchen Han, Yukun Cui, Xiaojiang Cui, Farin Amersi, Inês Donangelo, Song-Guang Ren, Шломо Мелмед and George Vlotides and has published in prestigious journals such as Cancer Research, Journal of the American College of Surgeons and Journal of Surgical Research.

In The Last Decade

Emily Siegel

9 papers receiving 371 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily Siegel United States 7 167 113 92 78 53 13 377
Bole Tian China 14 224 1.3× 171 1.5× 124 1.3× 154 2.0× 30 0.6× 33 483
Feng Cai China 13 67 0.4× 124 1.1× 60 0.7× 80 1.0× 109 2.1× 28 348
Kyo Sasaki Japan 7 77 0.5× 119 1.1× 63 0.7× 103 1.3× 27 0.5× 14 322
Isabella Tognarini Italy 11 107 0.6× 322 2.8× 295 3.2× 77 1.0× 42 0.8× 13 611
Wenjing Yang China 12 115 0.7× 214 1.9× 127 1.4× 58 0.7× 9 0.2× 17 414
Manjusha Thakar United States 9 98 0.6× 204 1.8× 81 0.9× 27 0.3× 42 0.8× 10 348
Ho Young Lim South Korea 8 175 1.0× 134 1.2× 62 0.7× 41 0.5× 7 0.1× 19 481
Baocheng Gong China 10 77 0.5× 140 1.2× 72 0.8× 22 0.3× 9 0.2× 30 310
Renyi Qin China 13 271 1.6× 277 2.5× 195 2.1× 53 0.7× 13 0.2× 44 570
Meng Xue China 18 115 0.7× 482 4.3× 255 2.8× 39 0.5× 14 0.3× 40 708

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Siegel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Siegel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Siegel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Siegel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Siegel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Siegel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Siegel. The network helps show where Emily Siegel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Siegel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Siegel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Siegel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Siegel. Emily Siegel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
3.
Siegel, Emily, John V. Kiluk, Armando E. Giuliano, & Brian J. Czerniecki. (2022). Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer. PubMed. 353–360.
4.
Siegel, Emily, et al.. (2021). Employing a Suite of Machine Learning Algorithms in a Holistic Approach to Trouble Stage Recognition and Failure Diagnostics. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition. 2 indexed citations
5.
Alban, Rodrigo F., et al.. (2021). Changes in utilization of axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis after the ACOSOG Z0011 trial. The Breast Journal. 27(3). 216–221. 13 indexed citations
6.
Siegel, Emily, et al.. (2019). Treatment at Academic Centers Increases Likelihood of Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Patients. Journal of Surgical Research. 247. 156–162. 6 indexed citations
7.
Siegel, Emily, et al.. (2018). Breast Cancer Treatment at Academic Centers Increases Likelihood of Reconstruction after Mastectomy. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 227(4). S31–S32.
8.
9.
Jin, Liting, Bingchen Han, Emily Siegel, et al.. (2018). Breast cancer lung metastasis: Molecular biology and therapeutic implications. Cancer Biology & Therapy. 19(10). 858–868. 217 indexed citations
10.
Gangi, Alexandra, et al.. (2018). Long-Term Outcomes after Elective versus Emergency Surgery for Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors. The American Surgeon. 84(10). 1570–1574. 14 indexed citations
11.
Chung, Alice, et al.. (2018). Menopausal Status and Outcomes of BRCA Mutation Carriers with Breast Cancer. The American Surgeon. 84(10). 1584–1588. 3 indexed citations
12.
Gangi, Alexandra, Emily Siegel, Galinos Barmparas, et al.. (2017). Multifocality in Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 22(2). 303–309. 54 indexed citations
13.
Vlotides, George, et al.. (2008). Rat Prolactinoma Cell Growth Regulation by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Ligands. Cancer Research. 68(15). 6377–6386. 59 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026