Emily Schulman
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 10%
- Catalysis top 10%
- Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions 6
- Catalysts for Methane Reforming 5
- Process Chemistry and Technology top 10%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 10%
- Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications 4
- Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis 4
-
- Catalytic Processes in Materials Science 7
- Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis 5
-
- Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions 2
-
- CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts 1
- Co-authors
- Dongxia LiuWei WuAndrew HolmesMichael FeyderTimothy J. BusseyJonathan L. BrigmanCarolyn GraybealLisa M. Saksida
- Journals
- Microporous and Mesoporous Materials (3 papers)Molecular Catalysis (2 papers)Catalysis Today (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Emily Schulman
15 papers receiving 545 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Behavioral Neuroscience 59
- Catalysis 110
- Process Chemistry and Technology 29
- Inorganic Chemistry 128
- Biological Psychiatry 18
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Schulman
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Schulman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Schulman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Schulman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Schulman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Schulman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Schulman. The network helps show where Emily Schulman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Schulman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 116 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 56 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 42 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 55 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 142 |
About Emily Schulman
Emily Schulman is a scholar working on Catalysis, Inorganic Chemistry and Process Chemistry and Technology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 552 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (7 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (6 papers), Catalysts for Methane Reforming (5 papers), Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis (5 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (4 papers), Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis (4 papers), Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions (2 papers) and CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (59 citations), Catalysis (110 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (29 citations). Emily Schulman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dongxia Liu, Wei Wu, Andrew Holmes, Michael Feyder, Timothy J. Bussey, Jonathan L. Brigman, Carolyn Graybeal, Lisa M. Saksida, Jianqiang Meng and Jing Chang. Their work appears in journals such as Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, Molecular Catalysis, Catalysis Today, Advanced Energy Materials and ACS Omega.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.