Emily S. Day

6.3k total citations · 3 hit papers
66 papers, 4.6k citations indexed

About

Emily S. Day is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily S. Day has authored 66 papers receiving a total of 4.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 42 papers in Molecular Biology, 28 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 24 papers in Biomaterials. Recurrent topics in Emily S. Day's work include RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (29 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (24 papers) and Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (23 papers). Emily S. Day is often cited by papers focused on RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (29 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (24 papers) and Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (23 papers). Emily S. Day collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and France. Emily S. Day's co-authors include Rachel Riley, Jennifer L. West, Mackenzie A. Scully, Jilian R. Melamed, Rebekah A. Drezek, Nastassja A. Lewinski, Jenna C. Harris, Danielle M. Valcourt, Megan N. Dang and Lissett R. Bickford and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Journal of Experimental Medicine and Genes & Development.

In The Last Decade

Emily S. Day

64 papers receiving 4.5k citations

Hit Papers

A New Era for Cancer Treatment: Gold‐Nanoparticle‐Mediate... 2010 2026 2015 2020 2010 2017 2013 200 400 600

Peers

Emily S. Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Biomedical Engineering 2.4k
  • Molecular Biology 1.9k
  • Biomaterials 1.5k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 1.1k
  • Materials Chemistry 995
Replace Chung Hang Jonathan Choi with:
Chung Hang Jonathan Choi Hong Kong
Xianghong Peng United States
Megan Mackey United States
Ju Hee Ryu South Korea
Arezou A. Ghazani United States
Jing Huang China
Yu Sakurai Japan
Amanda Silva France
Bo Cai China
Chung Hang Jonathan Choi Hong Kong View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Emily S. Day
Emily S. Day · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Emily S. Day
Emily S. Day · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Emily S. Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily S. Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily S. Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily S. Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily S. Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily S. Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily S. Day. The network helps show where Emily S. Day may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily S. Day

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily S. Day. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily S. Day based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily S. Day. Emily S. Day is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 1
4 1
5 5
6 5
7 5
8 9
9 43
10 18
11 15
12 12
13 4
14 65
15 213
16 69
17 32
18 103
19 51
20 58

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026