Emily S. Day
- Biomedical Engineering top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Biomaterials top 0.5%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 2%
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Co-authors
- Rachel RileyJennifer L. WestMackenzie A. ScullyJilian R. MelamedRebekah A. DrezekNastassja A. LewinskiJenna C. HarrisDanielle M. Valcourt
- Topics
- RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (29 papers)Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (24 papers)Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (23 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesThe Journal of Experimental MedicineGenes & Development
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsFrance
In The Last Decade
Emily S. Day
64 papers receiving 4.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Biomedical Engineering 2.4k
- Molecular Biology 1.9k
- Biomaterials 1.5k
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 1.1k
- Materials Chemistry 995
Countries citing papers authored by Emily S. Day
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily S. Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily S. Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily S. Day more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily S. Day
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily S. Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily S. Day. The network helps show where Emily S. Day may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily S. Day
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily S. Day. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily S. Day based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily S. Day. Emily S. Day is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 43 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 65 | |
| 15 | 213 | |
| 16 | 69 | |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | 103 | |
| 19 | 51 | |
| 20 | 58 |
About Emily S. Day
Emily S. Day is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Biomedical Engineering and Molecular Biology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (29 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (24 papers) and Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (1.5k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (1.1k citations) and Biomedical Engineering (2.4k citations). Emily S. Day has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Riley, Jennifer L. West, Mackenzie A. Scully, Jilian R. Melamed, Rebekah A. Drezek, Nastassja A. Lewinski, Jenna C. Harris, Danielle M. Valcourt, Megan N. Dang and Lissett R. Bickford. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Journal of Experimental Medicine and Genes & Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.