Emily Potter

129 total papers · 774 total citations
64 papers, 442 citations indexed

About

Emily Potter is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Geography, Planning and Development and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Potter has authored 64 papers receiving a total of 442 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 12 papers in Geography, Planning and Development and 10 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Emily Potter's work include Geographies of human-animal interactions (10 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (5 papers) and Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature (4 papers). Emily Potter is often cited by papers focused on Geographies of human-animal interactions (10 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (5 papers) and Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature (4 papers). Emily Potter collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Sweden and Philippines. Emily Potter's co-authors include Tania Lewis, Andrew Cashin, Tony Butler, Gay Hawkins, Kane Race, Candice Oster, Alison Mackinnon, Stephen McKenzie, Jennifer McKay and Warren Stevens and has published in prestigious journals such as Urban Studies, Journal of Rural Studies and Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Emily Potter

51 papers receiving 393 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Emily Potter	191	67	64	61	38	64	442
Karen Umemoto	193 1.0×	100 1.5×	14 0.2×	29 0.5×	26 0.7×	36	416
George Martin	113 0.6×	30 0.4×	40 0.6×	19 0.3×	24 0.6×	30	443
Howard Campbell	305 1.6×	37 0.6×	16 0.3×	45 0.7×	65 1.7×	36	480
Andrew Dawson	189 1.0×	18 0.3×	40 0.6×	41 0.7×	151 4.0×	49	474
John C. Weaver	153 0.8×	28 0.4×	21 0.3×	30 0.5×	48 1.3×	59	402
Maria Fannin	185 1.0×	43 0.6×	128 2.0×	54 0.9×	31 0.8×	39	460
Pamela J. Stewart	209 1.1×	51 0.8×	87 1.4×	11 0.2×	61 1.6×	43	468
Catherine Trundle	176 0.9×	56 0.8×	24 0.4×	32 0.5×	71 1.9×	24	390
Desmond Manderson	181 0.9×	65 1.0×	22 0.3×	73 1.2×	49 1.3×	83	488
Anna Johnston	159 0.8×	70 1.0×	22 0.3×	65 1.1×	28 0.7×	51	456

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Potter

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Potter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Potter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Potter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Potter

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Potter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Potter. The network helps show where Emily Potter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Potter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Potter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Potter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Potter. Emily Potter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact