Emily Pfaff

48 papers receiving 626 citations

Emily Pfaff's Hit Papers

Coding long COVID: characterizing a new disease through an ICD-10 lens 2023 · 84 citations
840+1+2Years since publication255075

Peers

Emily Pfaff
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Health Information Management 105
  • Health Informatics 14
  • Neurology 123
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 37
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 67
Replace Wai Keong Wong with:
Wai Keong Wong United Kingdom
Jing Huang United States
Helen Strongman United Kingdom
B. De Cock Belgium
Chengyun Liu China
Enrico Longato Italy
Rupert Major United Kingdom
Kyung Don Yoo South Korea
GR Bernard Gibraltar
Anna Ostropolets United States
Emily Pfaff relative to Wai Keong Wong United Kingdom Wai Keong Wong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Wai Keong Wong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Pfaff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Pfaff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Pfaff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Pfaff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Pfaff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Pfaff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Pfaff. The network helps show where Emily Pfaff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Pfaff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Pfaff Line = papers co-authored together Emily Pfaff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Coding long COVID: characterizing a new disease through an ICD-10 lens
Hit paper breakdown →
202384
2 201451
3 201847
4 201943
5 201541
6 202031
7 201330
8 201629
9 202028
10 202325
11 202222
12 202418
13 202217
14 201917
15 201915
16 201913
17 202012
18 202111
19 202210
20 20219

About Emily Pfaff

Emily Pfaff is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Health Information Management, Neurology, Infectious Diseases and Molecular Biology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 638 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Machine Learning in Healthcare (11 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (10 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (9 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (8 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (6 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (5 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (4 papers) and Air Quality and Health Impacts (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (105 citations), Health Informatics (14 citations), Neurology (123 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (37 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (67 citations). Emily Pfaff has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Christopher G. Chute, Stanley C. Ahalt, Karamarie Fecho, Melissa Haendel, Johanna Loomba, Richard A. Moffitt, Ashok Krishnamurthy, Elaine Hill, Robert L. Bradford and Hao Xu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, PLoS Medicine, Clinical Infectious Diseases and Diabetes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact