Emily Mendham

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
26 papers, 828 citations indexed

About

Emily Mendham is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Mendham has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 828 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 8 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Emily Mendham's work include Rural development and sustainability (11 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (4 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (4 papers). Emily Mendham is often cited by papers focused on Rural development and sustainability (11 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (4 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (4 papers). Emily Mendham collaborates with scholars based in Australia and United States. Emily Mendham's co-authors include Allan Curtis, Emma Jakku, Nadine Marshall, Mark Howden, Aysha Fleming, Michael Mitchell, Joanne Millar, Eric Toman, K.B. Sinclair and Simon McDonald and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Hydrology, Global Environmental Change and Climatic Change.

In The Last Decade

Emily Mendham

26 papers receiving 779 citations

Hit Papers

Informing adaptation responses to climate change through ... 2011 2026 2016 2021 2011 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily Mendham Australia 12 344 229 227 208 132 26 828
Jen Dyer United Kingdom 13 332 1.0× 184 0.8× 167 0.7× 326 1.6× 158 1.2× 18 856
Elin Enfors Sweden 13 527 1.5× 165 0.7× 132 0.6× 177 0.9× 154 1.2× 16 992
Donovan Campbell Jamaica 16 286 0.8× 164 0.7× 149 0.7× 205 1.0× 127 1.0× 31 779
Lun Yang China 20 478 1.4× 152 0.7× 187 0.8× 212 1.0× 219 1.7× 44 1.1k
David Mkwambisi Malawi 16 367 1.1× 212 0.9× 243 1.1× 447 2.1× 144 1.1× 34 1.1k
Federica Ravera Spain 20 500 1.5× 225 1.0× 211 0.9× 166 0.8× 238 1.8× 43 1.1k
Timothy J. Finan United States 14 307 0.9× 242 1.1× 122 0.5× 272 1.3× 91 0.7× 47 855
Amy Quandt United States 15 280 0.8× 188 0.8× 216 1.0× 384 1.8× 125 0.9× 46 1.0k
Ayat Ullah Czechia 17 242 0.7× 132 0.6× 242 1.1× 193 0.9× 90 0.7× 63 845
Jean McGuire United States 6 147 0.4× 178 0.8× 283 1.2× 213 1.0× 151 1.1× 6 688

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Mendham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Mendham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Mendham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Mendham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Mendham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Mendham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Mendham. The network helps show where Emily Mendham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Mendham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Mendham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Mendham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Mendham. Emily Mendham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Curtis, Allan, et al.. (2020). Does rural landowner identity shape the adoption of sustainable farming practices?. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management. 27(3). 309–328. 10 indexed citations
2.
Toman, Eric, Allan Curtis, & Emily Mendham. (2018). Same as it Ever Was? Stability and Change Over 15 Years in a Rural District in Southeastern Australia. Society & Natural Resources. 32(1). 113–132. 4 indexed citations
3.
Curtis, Allan, et al.. (2018). Cultural landscapes at risk: Exploring the meaning of place in a sacred valley of Nepal. Global Environmental Change. 52. 190–200. 24 indexed citations
5.
Mendham, Emily & Allan Curtis. (2018). Rural landholder judgements about the acceptability of cropping or draining wetlands on private land. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management. 26(1). 25–42. 2 indexed citations
6.
Curtis, Allan & Emily Mendham. (2017). The social drivers of natural resource management: Wimmera. Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO). 3 indexed citations
7.
Curtis, Allan, et al.. (2016). Examining the agricultural producer identity: utilising the collective occupational identity construct to create a typology and profile of rural landholders in Victoria, Australia. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 60(4). 628–646. 18 indexed citations
8.
Curtis, Allan, et al.. (2015). The Utility of a Collective Identity Construct to Explore the Influence of Farming Identity on Natural Resource Management. Society & Natural Resources. 29(5). 588–602. 7 indexed citations
9.
Sinclair, K.B., Allan Curtis, Emily Mendham, & Michael Mitchell. (2015). Assessing the Efficacy of Transition Theory to Identify Industry Transformation: a case study examining the deregulation of Australia's dairy industry. Australian Geographer. 46(1). 113–129. 6 indexed citations
10.
Curtis, Allan, et al.. (2015). The development and validation of a collective occupational identity construct (COIC) in a natural resource context. Journal of Rural Studies. 40. 111–119. 11 indexed citations
11.
12.
Sinclair, K.B., Allan Curtis, Emily Mendham, & Michael Mitchell. (2014). Can resilience thinking provide useful insights for those examining efforts to transform contemporary agriculture?. Agriculture and Human Values. 31(3). 371–384. 51 indexed citations
13.
Mendham, Emily & Allan Curtis. (2014). What lies beneath: Rural landholder interpretation of the risks of aquifer exploitation in Australia. Journal of Hydrology. 511. 180–189. 4 indexed citations
14.
Curtis, Allan & Emily Mendham. (2012). The social drivers of natural resource management in the Wimmera region. A report to the Wimmera Catchment Management Authority. 4 indexed citations
15.
Mendham, Emily, Allan Curtis, & Joanne Millar. (2012). The Natural Resource Management Implications of Rural Property Turnover. Ecology and Society. 17(4). 51 indexed citations
16.
Marshall, Nadine, et al.. (2011). Informing adaptation responses to climate change through theories of transformation. Global Environmental Change. 22(1). 115–126. 402 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Mitchell, Michael, et al.. (2011). Social research to improve groundwater governance: Literature review. 6 indexed citations
18.
Curtis, Allan, et al.. (2008). Understanding the social drivers for natural resource management in the Wimmera region. A report to the Wimmera Catchment Management Authority. 4 indexed citations
19.
Curtis, Allan, et al.. (2008). Understanding the social drivers for natural resource management in the Wimmera region. 20 indexed citations
20.
Mendham, Emily, Joanne Millar, & Allan Curtis. (2007). Landholder participation in native vegetation management in irrigation areas. Ecological Management & Restoration. 8(1). 42–48. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026