Emily K. Acton

465 total citations
28 papers, 303 citations indexed

About

Emily K. Acton is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily K. Acton has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 303 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 8 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 8 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Emily K. Acton's work include Epilepsy research and treatment (10 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (6 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (4 papers). Emily K. Acton is often cited by papers focused on Epilepsy research and treatment (10 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (6 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (4 papers). Emily K. Acton collaborates with scholars based in United States and Sweden. Emily K. Acton's co-authors include Allison W. Willis, William O. Tatum, Michael Gelfand, Sean Hennessy, Leah J. Blank, Lawrence J. Hirsch, Gregory D. Cascino, John Hixson, Andrew S. Blum and Selim R. Benbadis and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Brain and Neurology.

In The Last Decade

Emily K. Acton

26 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers

Emily K. Acton
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 187
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 86
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 56
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 29
  • Neurology 22
Replace Igor Filipčić with:
Igor Filipčić Croatia
Sarah M. Buchanan United Kingdom
John Noviasky United States
David Braunstein France
Bryan Adams United States
Holly A. Read United States
Marie Gérardin France
S. Nizam Ahmed Canada
Benjamin Chavez United States
Zahra Vahabi Iran
Igor Filipčić Croatia View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Emily K. Acton
Emily K. Acton · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Emily K. Acton
Emily K. Acton · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Emily K. Acton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily K. Acton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily K. Acton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily K. Acton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily K. Acton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily K. Acton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily K. Acton. The network helps show where Emily K. Acton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily K. Acton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily K. Acton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily K. Acton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily K. Acton. Emily K. Acton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 16
4 27
5 3
6 3
7 5
8 4
9 2
10 7
11 7
12 7
13 5
14 9
15 18
16 15
17 9
18 12
19 1
20 10

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026