Emily J. Haas
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology top 1%
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 2%
- Medical Laboratory Technology top 2%
- Strategy and Management
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Patrick L. YorioAndrew B. CecalaMarifran MattsonMaryann D’AlessandroJoseph W. McGuireBrianna M. EiterMegan CaseyJennifer Bell
- Topics
- Occupational Health and Safety Research (35 papers)Risk and Safety Analysis (21 papers)Quality and Safety in Healthcare (7 papers)
- Cited by
- Radiological and Ultrasound TechnologyMedical Laboratory TechnologyStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty
- Journals
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthSustainabilitySafety Science
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumRussia
In The Last Decade
Emily J. Haas
45 papers receiving 329 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 207
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 133
- Medical Laboratory Technology 61
- Strategy and Management 32
- Social Psychology 30
Countries citing papers authored by Emily J. Haas
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily J. Haas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily J. Haas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily J. Haas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily J. Haas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily J. Haas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily J. Haas. The network helps show where Emily J. Haas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily J. Haas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily J. Haas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily J. Haas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily J. Haas. Emily J. Haas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About Emily J. Haas
Emily J. Haas is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Medical Laboratory Technology and Chemical Health and Safety, having authored 52 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Health and Safety Research (35 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (21 papers) and Quality and Safety in Healthcare (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (207 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (61 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (133 citations). Emily J. Haas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Patrick L. Yorio, Andrew B. Cecala, Marifran Mattson, Maryann D’Alessandro, Joseph W. McGuire, Brianna M. Eiter, Megan Casey, Jennifer Bell, Emanuele Cauda and Jay F. Colinet. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Sustainability and Safety Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.