Emily J. Fray

1.2k total citations
7 papers, 62 citations indexed

About

Emily J. Fray is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Virology and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily J. Fray has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 62 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Infectious Diseases, 6 papers in Virology and 2 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Emily J. Fray's work include HIV Research and Treatment (6 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (5 papers) and Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (2 papers). Emily J. Fray is often cited by papers focused on HIV Research and Treatment (6 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (5 papers) and Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (2 papers). Emily J. Fray collaborates with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Emily J. Fray's co-authors include Janet D. Siliciano, Robert F. Siliciano, Mithra R. Kumar, Jun Lai, Chao Yang, Andrew E. Timmons, C. Korin Bullen, Dan H. Barouch, Weiwei Dai and Fengting Wu and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Cell Host & Microbe.

In The Last Decade

Emily J. Fray

5 papers receiving 62 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emily J. Fray United States	3	49	27	25	16	14	7	62
Hannah A. D. King United States	6	51 1.0×	23 0.9×	43 1.7×	11 0.7×	23 1.6×	12	82
Thandeka Nkosi South Africa	5	61 1.2×	33 1.2×	43 1.7×	18 1.1×	11 0.8×	7	86
Francis Mwimanzi Canada	5	46 0.9×	29 1.1×	25 1.0×	14 0.9×	7 0.5×	7	63
Sean C. Patro United States	4	76 1.6×	44 1.6×	32 1.3×	17 1.1×	15 1.1×	10	86
Joseph Varriale United States	2	60 1.2×	40 1.5×	17 0.7×	8 0.5×	13 0.9×	3	66
Cuixian Yang China	5	22 0.4×	34 1.3×	19 0.8×	18 1.1×	12 0.9×	14	67
Dieter Mielke United States	5	46 0.9×	27 1.0×	42 1.7×	16 1.0×	13 0.9×	7	78
Lucía Bailón Spain	5	40 0.8×	37 1.4×	10 0.4×	9 0.6×	17 1.2×	14	66
Genevieve McCormack United States	3	83 1.7×	62 2.3×	22 0.9×	15 0.9×	11 0.8×	4	105
Matthias Schmitt-Haendle Germany	6	48 1.0×	27 1.0×	29 1.2×	13 0.8×	9 0.6×	6	65

Countries citing papers authored by Emily J. Fray

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily J. Fray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily J. Fray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily J. Fray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily J. Fray

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily J. Fray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily J. Fray. The network helps show where Emily J. Fray may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily J. Fray

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily J. Fray. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily J. Fray based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily J. Fray. Emily J. Fray is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

White, Jennifer A., Filippo Dragoni, Emily J. Fray, et al.. (2025). Superinfection promotes replication and diversification of defective HIV-1 proviruses in people with non-suppressible viraemia. Nature Microbiology. 10(11). 2736–2748.

2.

Fray, Emily J., Fengting Wu, Carolin Zitzmann, et al.. (2025). SIV proviruses seeded later in infection are harbored in short-lived CD4+ T cells. Cell Reports. 44(5). 115663–115663.

3.

Berendam, Stella J., George M. Shaw, Katharine J. Bar, et al.. (2024). Assessing the impact of autologous virus neutralizing antibodies on viral rebound time in postnatally SHIV-infected ART-treated infant rhesus macaques. Epidemics. 48. 100780–100780. 1 indexed citations

4.

Fray, Emily J., Fengting Wu, Francesco R. Simonetti, et al.. (2023). Antiretroviral therapy reveals triphasic decay of intact SIV genomes and persistence of ancestral variants. Cell Host & Microbe. 31(3). 356–372.e5. 12 indexed citations

5.

Kumar, Mithra R., Emily J. Fray, Alexandra M. Bender, et al.. (2023). Biphasic decay of intact SHIV genomes following initiation of antiretroviral therapy complicates analysis of interventions targeting the reservoir. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 120(43). e2313209120–e2313209120. 2 indexed citations

6.

Walker-Sperling, Victoria E., Noe B. Mercado, Abishek Chandrashekar, et al.. (2022). Therapeutic efficacy of combined active and passive immunization in ART-suppressed, SHIV-infected rhesus macaques. Nature Communications. 13(1). 3463–3463. 22 indexed citations

7.

Timmons, Andrew E., Emily J. Fray, Mithra R. Kumar, et al.. (2020). HSF1 inhibition attenuates HIV-1 latency reversal mediated by several candidate LRAs In Vitro and Ex Vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117(27). 15763–15771. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact