Emily Groves

405 total citations
13 papers, 299 citations indexed

About

Emily Groves is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Groves has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 299 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Emily Groves's work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (6 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers) and Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (2 papers). Emily Groves is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral and Psychological Studies (6 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers) and Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (2 papers). Emily Groves collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Switzerland. Emily Groves's co-authors include Jennifer L. Austin, Padinjat Raghu, Roman Holič, Pentti Somerharju, Kathryn Garner, Shamshad Cockcroft, Alan N. Hunt, Michelle Li, Grielof Koster and Dan A. Smale and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Emily Groves

12 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

Emily Groves
Helen Prescott United Kingdom
Mary Kate Worden United States
Liz Brown New Zealand
M. van der Velde Netherlands
T. Oliveira Portugal
Jillian M. Couto United Kingdom
Megan Fitzgerald United States
Helen Prescott United Kingdom
Emily Groves
Citations per year, relative to Emily Groves Emily Groves (= 1×) peers Helen Prescott

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Groves

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Groves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Groves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Groves more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Groves

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Groves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Groves. The network helps show where Emily Groves may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Groves

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Groves. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Groves based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Groves. Emily Groves is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Neff, Patrick, et al.. (2025). ANT - Advancing Neurofeedback (In Tinnitus). 744–746.
2.
3.
Groves, Emily, et al.. (2023). A Systematic Review of Group Contingencies in Alternative Education Settings. Education and Treatment of Children. 46(2). 145–164. 3 indexed citations
4.
Vera, Manuel, Francesco Maroso, Miguel Hermida, et al.. (2021). Genomic survey of edible cockle (Cerastoderma edule) in the Northeast Atlantic: A baseline for sustainable management of its wild resources. Evolutionary Applications. 15(2). 262–285. 18 indexed citations
5.
Mahony, Kate, Sian Egerton, Sharon A. Lynch, et al.. (2021). Drivers of growth in a keystone fished species along the European Atlantic coast: The common cockle Cerastoderma edule. Journal of Sea Research. 179. 102148–102148. 6 indexed citations
6.
Groves, Emily, et al.. (2021). Adapting the good behavior game for special education classrooms. Psychology in the Schools. 59(5). 1015–1031. 11 indexed citations
7.
King, Nathan G., Niall J. McKeown, Dan A. Smale, et al.. (2020). Hierarchical genetic structuring in the cool boreal kelp, Laminaria digitata: implications for conservation and management. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 77(5). 1906–1913. 5 indexed citations
8.
Groves, Emily & Jennifer L. Austin. (2020). Examining Adaptations of the Good Behavior Game: A Comparison of Known and Unknown Criteria for Winning. School Psychology Review. 49(1). 74–84. 10 indexed citations
9.
King, Nathan G., Niall J. McKeown, Dan A. Smale, et al.. (2019). Evidence for different thermal ecotypes in range centre and trailing edge kelp populations. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 514-515. 10–17. 55 indexed citations
10.
Groves, Emily & Jennifer L. Austin. (2018). Does the Good Behavior Game evoke negative peer pressure? Analyses in primary and secondary classrooms. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 52(1). 3–16. 35 indexed citations
11.
Groves, Emily & Jennifer L. Austin. (2017). An evaluation of interdependent and independent group contingencies during the good behavior game. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 50(3). 552–566. 44 indexed citations
12.
Austin, Jennifer L., et al.. (2015). Validating trial-based functional analyses in mainstream primary school classrooms. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 48(2). 274–288. 34 indexed citations
13.
Garner, Kathryn, Alan N. Hunt, Grielof Koster, et al.. (2012). Phosphatidylinositol Transfer Protein, Cytoplasmic 1 (PITPNC1) Binds and Transfers Phosphatidic Acid. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 287(38). 32263–32276. 74 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026