Emily Crossette
About
In The Last Decade
Emily Crossette
12 papers receiving 261 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Pollution 142
- Molecular Biology 88
- Molecular Medicine 62
- Infectious Diseases 47
- Ecology 40
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Crossette
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Crossette's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Crossette with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Crossette more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Crossette
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Crossette. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Crossette. The network helps show where Emily Crossette may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Crossette
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Crossette. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Crossette based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Crossette. Emily Crossette is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 139 | |
| 13 | 38 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.