Emily Courcier

1.3k total citations
32 papers, 872 citations indexed

About

Emily Courcier is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Small Animals and Agronomy and Crop Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Courcier has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 872 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Infectious Diseases, 11 papers in Small Animals and 9 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science. Recurrent topics in Emily Courcier's work include Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (10 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (9 papers) and Microbial infections and disease research (9 papers). Emily Courcier is often cited by papers focused on Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (10 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (9 papers) and Microbial infections and disease research (9 papers). Emily Courcier collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and France. Emily Courcier's co-authors include D. J. Mellor, P.S. Yam, RM Thomson, Philippa S. Yam, William Weir, Andy Tait, Brian Shiels, Martin Simuunza, Charlotte Evans and F. D. Menzies and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Emerging infectious diseases and Vaccine.

In The Last Decade

Emily Courcier

32 papers receiving 812 citations

Peers

Emily Courcier
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Small Animals 427
  • Genetics 316
  • Infectious Diseases 218
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 135
  • Equine 126
Replace Scott B. Citino with:
Scott B. Citino United States
Murray R. Woodbury Canada
Garry A. Anderson Australia
Henrik Hagbard Petersen Denmark
N. U. Horadagoda Sri Lanka
Terry L Whiting Canada
Annette Litster United States
Fernando José Benesi Brazil
G. Fecteau Canada
J.S. Gilmour United Kingdom
Scott B. Citino United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Emily Courcier
Emily Courcier · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Emily Courcier
Emily Courcier · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Courcier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Courcier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Courcier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Courcier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Courcier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Courcier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Courcier. The network helps show where Emily Courcier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Courcier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Courcier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Courcier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Courcier. Emily Courcier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 2
2 7
3 2
4 8
5 2
6 2
7 15
8 3
9 27
10 27
11 1
12 23
13 29
14
Risk assessment, targeted surveillance and policy formulation: practical experiences with bluetongue.
2
15 55
16 24
17 209
18 110
19 18
20 11

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026