Emily C. Parke
- Molecular Biology
- History and Philosophy of Science top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- Maureen A. O’MalleyMark A. BedauJohn S. McCaskillNorman H. PackardJames E. RussellKrushil WateneDaniel HikuroaSteen Rasmussen
- Topics
- Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (3 papers)Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers)Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Emily C. Parke
18 papers receiving 202 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Molecular Biology 74
- History and Philosophy of Science 47
- Sociology and Political Science 37
- Cognitive Neuroscience 27
- Genetics 25
Countries citing papers authored by Emily C. Parke
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily C. Parke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily C. Parke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily C. Parke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily C. Parke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily C. Parke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily C. Parke. The network helps show where Emily C. Parke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily C. Parke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily C. Parke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily C. Parke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily C. Parke. Emily C. Parke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | Predator free New Zealand: Social, cultural, and ethical challenges | 14 |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | Predator Free New Zealand: Social, Cultural, and Ethical Challenges BioHeritage Challenge | 3 |
| 9 | 48 | |
| 10 | Ethical responsibilities in invasion biology | 5 |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | Experiments, Simulations, and Lessons from Experimental Evolution | 1 |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 50 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | Living Technology: 5 Questions | 5 |
| 18 | 30 |
About Emily C. Parke
Emily C. Parke is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 18 papers that have together received 220 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (3 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers) and Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (47 citations), Ecological Modeling (7 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (24 citations). Emily C. Parke has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Maureen A. O’Malley, Mark A. Bedau, John S. McCaskill, Norman H. Packard, James E. Russell, Krushil Watene, Daniel Hikuroa, Steen Rasmussen, Alexandra S. Penn and Pelle Guldborg Hansen. Their work appears in journals such as BioScience, Philosophy of Science and Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.