Emily C. King

72 total papers · 583 total citations
45 papers, 402 citations indexed

About

Emily C. King is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily C. King has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 402 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in General Health Professions, 13 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation and 7 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Emily C. King's work include Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (13 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (9 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (7 papers). Emily C. King is often cited by papers focused on Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (13 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (9 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (7 papers). Emily C. King collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and India. Emily C. King's co-authors include Sandra McKay, Brian E. Maki, P. J. Holliday, Alison C. Novak, Tilak Dutta, Geoff Fernie, Kenneth C. Cheng, Carol Y. Scovil, Gavin J. Andrews and Amy Peters and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biomechanics, Experimental Brain Research and IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

In The Last Decade

Emily C. King

38 papers receiving 384 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Emily C. King 157 82 74 68 55 45 402
Mizue Suzuki 145 0.9× 152 1.9× 30 0.4× 85 1.3× 62 1.1× 23 429
Chutima Jalayondeja 99 0.6× 106 1.3× 17 0.2× 32 0.5× 40 0.7× 31 400
Eun‐Young Yoo 33 0.2× 120 1.5× 62 0.8× 45 0.7× 18 0.3× 61 387
Meral Sertel 89 0.6× 103 1.3× 16 0.2× 52 0.8× 34 0.6× 57 362
José Antonio Merchán-Baeza 48 0.3× 67 0.8× 23 0.3× 49 0.7× 24 0.4× 42 358
Lei Yang 182 1.2× 152 1.9× 43 0.6× 30 0.4× 14 0.3× 31 411
Dorota Sadowska 101 0.6× 37 0.5× 16 0.2× 23 0.3× 94 1.7× 37 354
Arzu Genç 70 0.4× 94 1.1× 13 0.2× 34 0.5× 20 0.4× 50 402
Monica Emma Liubicich 200 1.3× 112 1.4× 29 0.4× 32 0.5× 24 0.4× 19 362
Namrata Grampurohit 38 0.2× 114 1.4× 54 0.7× 21 0.3× 32 0.6× 35 395

Countries citing papers authored by Emily C. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily C. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily C. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily C. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily C. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily C. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily C. King. The network helps show where Emily C. King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily C. King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily C. King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily C. King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily C. King. Emily C. King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026