Emily C. Giles

40 total papers · 695 total citations
17 papers, 387 citations indexed

About

Emily C. Giles is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily C. Giles has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 387 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Ecology, 8 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 6 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Emily C. Giles's work include Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (7 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (6 papers) and Marine Sponges and Natural Products (4 papers). Emily C. Giles is often cited by papers focused on Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (7 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (6 papers) and Marine Sponges and Natural Products (4 papers). Emily C. Giles collaborates with scholars based in Chile, Saudi Arabia and France. Emily C. Giles's co-authors include Timothy Ravasi, Ute Hentschel, Lucas Moitinho‐Silva, Pablo Saenz‐Agudelo, Janine Kamke, Susanne Schmitt, Michael W. Taylor, Michael L. Berumen, Carlo Vittorio Cannistraci and Taewoo Ryu and has published in prestigious journals such as Molecular Ecology, Journal of Biogeography and FEMS Microbiology Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Emily C. Giles

17 papers receiving 378 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Emily C. Giles 207 196 113 85 81 17 387
Andrea Blanquer 276 1.3× 194 1.0× 59 0.5× 66 0.8× 44 0.5× 12 394
Astrid Schuster 225 1.1× 152 0.8× 50 0.4× 99 1.2× 24 0.3× 19 343
Annika Putz 170 0.8× 60 0.3× 123 1.1× 37 0.4× 26 0.3× 14 368
Niamh E. Redmond 381 1.8× 216 1.1× 73 0.6× 127 1.5× 21 0.3× 16 443
Marnie L. Freckelton 102 0.5× 174 0.9× 31 0.3× 52 0.6× 55 0.7× 14 358
Andia Chaves‐Fonnegra 207 1.0× 296 1.5× 28 0.2× 19 0.2× 47 0.6× 21 354
Ian S. Johnston 193 0.9× 119 0.6× 24 0.2× 23 0.3× 168 2.1× 11 379
Jack Rudloe 114 0.6× 45 0.2× 56 0.5× 84 1.0× 10 0.1× 14 403
Ming‐Chyuan Chen 175 0.8× 266 1.4× 34 0.3× 85 1.0× 78 1.0× 16 406
Laura Garzoli 69 0.3× 149 0.8× 80 0.7× 88 1.0× 10 0.1× 22 369

Countries citing papers authored by Emily C. Giles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily C. Giles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily C. Giles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily C. Giles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily C. Giles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily C. Giles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily C. Giles. The network helps show where Emily C. Giles may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily C. Giles

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily C. Giles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily C. Giles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily C. Giles. Emily C. Giles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026