Emily Anthes

600 total citations
10 papers, 397 citations indexed

About

Emily Anthes is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Anthes has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 397 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 2 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Emily Anthes's work include Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper). Emily Anthes is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper). Emily Anthes collaborates with scholars based in Canada. Emily Anthes's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Scientific American and Scientific American Mind.

In The Last Decade

Emily Anthes

8 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers

Emily Anthes

AP

GHP

ECP

CP

SPS

Hemant Bhargav India

John Wallert Sweden

Fredrika Norlund Sweden

Paulina Bondaronek United Kingdom

Chariklia Tziraki Greece

Steven S. Henley United States

Sara Laureen Bartels Netherlands

Meysam Pirbaglou Canada

Marion Zucker Goldstein United States

M.A.E. Baars Netherlands

Hemant Bhargav India

Emily Anthes

57 ×0.4

AP

35 ×0.4

GHP

56 ×0.7

ECP

286 ×4.2

CP

28 ×0.5

SPS

Citations per year, relative to Emily Anthes Emily Anthes (= 1×) peers Hemant Bhargav

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Anthes

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Anthes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Anthes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Anthes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Anthes

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Anthes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Anthes. The network helps show where Emily Anthes may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Anthes, Emily. (2020). Alexa, do I have COVID-19?. Nature. 586(7827). 22–25. 16 indexed citations

2.

Anthes, Emily. (2016). The office experiment: Can science build the perfect workspace?. Nature. 537(7620). 294–296. 4 indexed citations

3.

Anthes, Emily. (2016). Mental health: There’s an app for that. Nature. 532(7597). 20–23. 241 indexed citations

4.

Anthes, Emily. (2015). Save blood save lives. Nature. 12(7). 21–24. 4 indexed citations

5.

Anthes, Emily. (2015). Hospital checklists are meant to save lives — so why do they often fail?. Nature. 523(7562). 516–518. 41 indexed citations

6.

Anthes, Emily. (2015). Evidence-based medicine: Save blood, save lives. Nature. 520(7545). 24–26. 36 indexed citations

7.

Anthes, Emily. (2014). Depression: A change of mind. Nature. 515(7526). 185–187. 54 indexed citations

8.

Anthes, Emily. (2013). A Dolphin's Tale. Scientific American. 308(3). 78–81. 1 indexed citations

9.

Anthes, Emily. (2010). Family Guy. Scientific American Mind. 21(2). 46–53.

10.

Anthes, Emily. (2010). Ambidexterity and ADHD. Scientific American Mind. 21(3). 7–7.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact